Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2025
Prognostic Impact of the Postoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level after Curative Resection of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tsukamoto Ryoichi, Sugimoto Kiichi, Ii Yuki, Irie Takahiro, Kawaguchi Megumi, Kobari Aya, Tsuchiya Yuki, Honjo Kumpei, Kawai Masaya, Ishiyama Shun, Takahashi Makoto, Sakamoto Kazuhiro
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to investigate whether preoperative or postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) with a new cut-off value is more optimal for predicting long-term outcomes in patients with Stage II/III rectal cancer, and to investigate the effectiveness of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (POAC) based on the CEA values.
METHODS: Serum CEA levels were measured preoperatively (pre-CEA) and postoperatively (post-CEA). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was used to determine a cut-off for CEA. The cut-off for CEA relative to recurrence-free survival (RFS) was established as that giving the highest AUROC. In comparison of superiority between pre- and post- CEA levels, Akaike's information criterion (AIC) was used in the Cox proportional-hazard regression model.
RESULTS: The subjects were 323 patients who underwent curative surgical treatment for Stage II/III rectal cancer. AIC values indicated that RFS was better stratified by a post-CEA level with a cut-off of 2.3 ng/ml compared with other classifications of pre- or post- CEA. In Stage III or high-risk Stage II cases, there was no effect of POAC on RFS in those with post-CEA <2.3 ng/ml (p=0.39), but in those with post-CEA ≥2.3 ng/ml there was a trend for better RFS in patients who received POAC compared to those without POAC (p=0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with post-CEA ≥2.3 ng/ml had worse long-term outcomes compared with those with post-CEA <2.3 ng/ml. Post-CEA with a cut-off of 2.3 ng/ml may be useful in determining the indication for POAC for in Stage III or high-risk Stage II cases.
METHODS: Serum CEA levels were measured preoperatively (pre-CEA) and postoperatively (post-CEA). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was used to determine a cut-off for CEA. The cut-off for CEA relative to recurrence-free survival (RFS) was established as that giving the highest AUROC. In comparison of superiority between pre- and post- CEA levels, Akaike's information criterion (AIC) was used in the Cox proportional-hazard regression model.
RESULTS: The subjects were 323 patients who underwent curative surgical treatment for Stage II/III rectal cancer. AIC values indicated that RFS was better stratified by a post-CEA level with a cut-off of 2.3 ng/ml compared with other classifications of pre- or post- CEA. In Stage III or high-risk Stage II cases, there was no effect of POAC on RFS in those with post-CEA <2.3 ng/ml (p=0.39), but in those with post-CEA ≥2.3 ng/ml there was a trend for better RFS in patients who received POAC compared to those without POAC (p=0.06).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with post-CEA ≥2.3 ng/ml had worse long-term outcomes compared with those with post-CEA <2.3 ng/ml. Post-CEA with a cut-off of 2.3 ng/ml may be useful in determining the indication for POAC for in Stage III or high-risk Stage II cases.