Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
Salvage vs. Primary Total Laryngectomy in Patients with Locally Advanced Laryngeal or Hypopharyngeal Carcinoma: Oncologic Outcomes and Their Predictive Factors.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shoushtari Shahin Tahan, Gal Jocelyn, Chamorey Emmanuel, Schiappa Renaud, Dassonville Olivier, Poissonnet Gilles, Aloi Déborah, Barret Médéric, Safta Inga, Saada Esma, Sudaka Anne, Culié Dorian, Bozec Alexandre
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to compare the survival outcomes of salvage vs. primary total laryngectomy (TL) in patients with locally advanced laryngeal or hypopharyngeal carcinoma and to determine their predictive factors.
METHODS: Overall (OS), cause-specific (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of primary vs. salvage TL were compared in univariate and multivariate analysis taking into account other potential predictive factors (tumor site, tumor stage, comorbidity level etc.).
RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were included in this study. Five-year OS was 53% and 25% for the primary and salvage TL groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent negative impact of salvage TL on OS (p = 0.0008), CSS (p < 0.0001) and RFS (p < 0.0001). Hypopharyngeal tumor site, ASA score ≥ 3, N-stage ≥ 2a and positive surgical margins were the main other predictors of oncologic outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Salvage TL is associated with significantly worse survival rates than primary TL highlighting the need for careful selection of patients who are candidates for larynx preservation. The predictive factors of survival outcomes identified here should be considered in the therapeutic decision-making, especially in the setting of salvage TL, given the poor prognosis of these patients.
METHODS: Overall (OS), cause-specific (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of primary vs. salvage TL were compared in univariate and multivariate analysis taking into account other potential predictive factors (tumor site, tumor stage, comorbidity level etc.).
RESULTS: A total of 234 patients were included in this study. Five-year OS was 53% and 25% for the primary and salvage TL groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent negative impact of salvage TL on OS (p = 0.0008), CSS (p < 0.0001) and RFS (p < 0.0001). Hypopharyngeal tumor site, ASA score ≥ 3, N-stage ≥ 2a and positive surgical margins were the main other predictors of oncologic outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Salvage TL is associated with significantly worse survival rates than primary TL highlighting the need for careful selection of patients who are candidates for larynx preservation. The predictive factors of survival outcomes identified here should be considered in the therapeutic decision-making, especially in the setting of salvage TL, given the poor prognosis of these patients.