American journal of otolaryngology · 2022
Reproducibility of laryngeal force sensor measurements.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Tiffany V, Feng Allen L, Puka Elefteria, Rao Vishwanatha, Ciaramella Alex, Shah Shivani, Song Phillip C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The laryngeal force sensor (LFS) measures force during suspension microlaryngoscopy (SML) procedures, and has been previously shown to predict postoperative complications. Reproducibility of its measurements has not been described.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic medical center.
METHODS: 291 adult patients had force data collected from 2017 to 2021 during various SML procedures. 94 patients had passive LFS monitoring (surgeon blinded to intraoperative recordings) and 197 had active LFS monitoring (surgeon able to see LFS recordings). 27 of these patients had repeat procedures, with unique LFS metrics for each procedure. The 27 patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 had passive use for both procedures, group 2 had passive use for the first procedure and active use for the second, and group 3 had active use for both procedures. Force metrics from the two procedures were compared with a paired samples t-test.
RESULTS: For airway dilation procedures and cancer resection procedures, average force variances were significantly lower with active versus passive use of the LFS. Group 1-no significant changes in maximum force (procedure 1 = 163.8 N, procedure 2 = 133.8 N, p = 0.324) or average force (procedure 1 = 93.6 N, procedure 2 = 78.3 N, p = 0.617). Group 2-maximum force dropped by 35 % between procedures 1 (219.2 N) and 2 (142.5 N), p = 0.013. Average force dropped by 42.5 % between procedures 1 (147.2 N) and 2 (84.6 N), p = 0.007. Group 3-no significant changes in maximum force (procedure 1 = 158.6 N, procedure 2 = 158.2 N, p = 0.986) or average force (procedure 1 = 94.2, procedure 2 = 81.8, p = 0.419).
CONCLUSIONS: LFS measurements were reproducible for similar procedures in the same patient when the type of LFS monitoring was not a confounder.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Academic medical center.
METHODS: 291 adult patients had force data collected from 2017 to 2021 during various SML procedures. 94 patients had passive LFS monitoring (surgeon blinded to intraoperative recordings) and 197 had active LFS monitoring (surgeon able to see LFS recordings). 27 of these patients had repeat procedures, with unique LFS metrics for each procedure. The 27 patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 had passive use for both procedures, group 2 had passive use for the first procedure and active use for the second, and group 3 had active use for both procedures. Force metrics from the two procedures were compared with a paired samples t-test.
RESULTS: For airway dilation procedures and cancer resection procedures, average force variances were significantly lower with active versus passive use of the LFS. Group 1-no significant changes in maximum force (procedure 1 = 163.8 N, procedure 2 = 133.8 N, p = 0.324) or average force (procedure 1 = 93.6 N, procedure 2 = 78.3 N, p = 0.617). Group 2-maximum force dropped by 35 % between procedures 1 (219.2 N) and 2 (142.5 N), p = 0.013. Average force dropped by 42.5 % between procedures 1 (147.2 N) and 2 (84.6 N), p = 0.007. Group 3-no significant changes in maximum force (procedure 1 = 158.6 N, procedure 2 = 158.2 N, p = 0.986) or average force (procedure 1 = 94.2, procedure 2 = 81.8, p = 0.419).
CONCLUSIONS: LFS measurements were reproducible for similar procedures in the same patient when the type of LFS monitoring was not a confounder.