Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2018
Prospective analysis of the utility of 18-FDG PET in Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin: A Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study, TROG 09:03.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Poulsen Michael, Macfarlane David, Veness Michael, Estall Venessa, Hruby George, Kumar Mahesh, Pullar Andrew, Tripcony Lee, Rischin Danny
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: TROG 09.03 prospectively studied the utility of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (18-FDG) PET in the management of Merkel cell carcinoma of skin.
METHODS: Following consent and registration, a pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT was performed. Sites of avid disease were confirmed by cytology where practicable. Following surgery, patients with AJCCv7 Stages IIA-IIIB disease were treated with chemo-radiotherapy and reassessed with a post-treatment PET.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight subjects (45 males and 13 females, median age 68 years) were enrolled between 2011 and 2015, 43 patients of whom went on to receive chemo-radiotherapy. An occult primary was present in 22 (37.9%), T1 in 22 (37.9%) and T2 disease in 14 (24.1%). Nodal disease was present in 69% of cases. Fifty per cent of subjects had gross residual disease at the primary site and/or nodal site at the time of registration. 18-FDG PET/CT had a sensitivity of 94.74% (95% CI 82-99.3%) and a specificity of 88.24% (95% CI 63.56-98.54). The positive predictive value was 94.74% (83.01-98.51) and the negative predictive value was 88.24% (95% CI 65.81-96.69). The pre-treatment PET influenced a treatment decision in 27.6% of cases. Upstaging occurred in 15 (25.9%), with no down staging. Other diseases were identified in 4 (6.9%) patients. Univariate analysis failed to demonstrate that pre-treatment SUV levels or a negative post-treatment PET had any impact on overall survival. PET staged patients had 89% 3-year in-field loco-regional control and 76% 3-year overall survival.
CONCLUSION: Staging 18-FDG-PET significantly influenced treatment decisions in approximately one-third of cases of MCC and should be considered in the routine pre-treatment work-up. Post-treatment PET was not found to be prognostic. Funding through the Medicare Benefits Schedule needs to be considered for high risk MCC.
METHODS: Following consent and registration, a pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT was performed. Sites of avid disease were confirmed by cytology where practicable. Following surgery, patients with AJCCv7 Stages IIA-IIIB disease were treated with chemo-radiotherapy and reassessed with a post-treatment PET.
RESULTS: Fifty-eight subjects (45 males and 13 females, median age 68 years) were enrolled between 2011 and 2015, 43 patients of whom went on to receive chemo-radiotherapy. An occult primary was present in 22 (37.9%), T1 in 22 (37.9%) and T2 disease in 14 (24.1%). Nodal disease was present in 69% of cases. Fifty per cent of subjects had gross residual disease at the primary site and/or nodal site at the time of registration. 18-FDG PET/CT had a sensitivity of 94.74% (95% CI 82-99.3%) and a specificity of 88.24% (95% CI 63.56-98.54). The positive predictive value was 94.74% (83.01-98.51) and the negative predictive value was 88.24% (95% CI 65.81-96.69). The pre-treatment PET influenced a treatment decision in 27.6% of cases. Upstaging occurred in 15 (25.9%), with no down staging. Other diseases were identified in 4 (6.9%) patients. Univariate analysis failed to demonstrate that pre-treatment SUV levels or a negative post-treatment PET had any impact on overall survival. PET staged patients had 89% 3-year in-field loco-regional control and 76% 3-year overall survival.
CONCLUSION: Staging 18-FDG-PET significantly influenced treatment decisions in approximately one-third of cases of MCC and should be considered in the routine pre-treatment work-up. Post-treatment PET was not found to be prognostic. Funding through the Medicare Benefits Schedule needs to be considered for high risk MCC.