European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
Serum CD64 and ascitic fluid calprotectin and microRNA-155 as potential biomarkers of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nabiel Yasmin, Barakat Ghada, Abed Sally
Аннотация
AIM: Patients with ascites are at a higher risk for associated of on top bacterial infections with subsequent life-threatening complications. We aimed to evaluate CD64, calprotectin, and microRNA-155 (miR-155) levels as diagnostic markers of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) and the effect of using more than one use on the same spot over their diagnostic efficiency.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational comparative study included 103 patients with ascites admitted to the Tropical Medicine Department, Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt, divided into two groups: case group (64 patients) with ascites with SBP and control group (39 patients) with decompensated cirrhotic non-SBP ascites. Twenty milliliters of ascetic fluid was obtained from all participants for bacterial culture, and assessment of calprotectin and miR-155, in addition to 2 ml blood for the CD64 marker expression assay by a flowcytometer.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of CD64 expression assay were 95.3 and 92.3%, respectively, area under the curve (AUC)=0.93, whereas those of ascetic fluid calprotectin and miR-155 were 87.5 and 82.1%, AUC=0.90 and 95.3 and 97.4%, with AUC of 0.95. Combined blood CD64 and ascetic fluid calprotectin had a diagnostic accuracy of 0.988 for blood CD64 and ascetic fluid miR-155, AUC=0.991, and that for ascetic fluid calprotectin and miR-155 was 0.988. On using the three studied markers together, the diagnostic accuracy was the best recorded, AUC=0.994. P values were less than 0.001.
CONCLUSION: CD64, calprotectin, and miR-155 were good diagnostic markers of SBP and on using this combination, greater efficiency in diagnosis was achieved.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational comparative study included 103 patients with ascites admitted to the Tropical Medicine Department, Mansoura University Hospital, Egypt, divided into two groups: case group (64 patients) with ascites with SBP and control group (39 patients) with decompensated cirrhotic non-SBP ascites. Twenty milliliters of ascetic fluid was obtained from all participants for bacterial culture, and assessment of calprotectin and miR-155, in addition to 2 ml blood for the CD64 marker expression assay by a flowcytometer.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of CD64 expression assay were 95.3 and 92.3%, respectively, area under the curve (AUC)=0.93, whereas those of ascetic fluid calprotectin and miR-155 were 87.5 and 82.1%, AUC=0.90 and 95.3 and 97.4%, with AUC of 0.95. Combined blood CD64 and ascetic fluid calprotectin had a diagnostic accuracy of 0.988 for blood CD64 and ascetic fluid miR-155, AUC=0.991, and that for ascetic fluid calprotectin and miR-155 was 0.988. On using the three studied markers together, the diagnostic accuracy was the best recorded, AUC=0.994. P values were less than 0.001.
CONCLUSION: CD64, calprotectin, and miR-155 were good diagnostic markers of SBP and on using this combination, greater efficiency in diagnosis was achieved.