MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.25503

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2018

Values of fine-needle aspiration cytology of parotid gland tumors: A review of 996 cases at a single institution.

Suzuki Manabu, Kawata Ryo, Higashino Masaaki, Nishikawa Shuji, Terada Tetsuya, Haginomori Shin-Ichi, Kurisu Yoshitaka, Hirose Yoshinobu

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in a large series of benign and malignant parotid tumors.

METHODS

The FNAC diagnosis of 821 benign and 175 malignant parotid tumors managed at our department between 1999 and 2017 was correlated with the final histology.

RESULTS

FNAC made a correct histopathological diagnosis in 72% of the benign parotid tumors; however, FNAC provided a correct grade in only 34% of the malignant tumors. FNAC correctly identified the histology of 94% of pleomorphic adenomas subsequently confirmed by histopathological examination. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of FNAC for detecting malignancy were 82.3%, 98.7%, and 95.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

FNAC generally provided the correct histological diagnosis for benign tumors. However, the histological evaluation and grading of malignant tumors were poor. Although FNAC showed good sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, its sensitivity decreased when nondiagnostic cases were included in the analysis.

Для цитирования: Suzuki Manabu, Kawata Ryo, Higashino Masaaki, Nishikawa Shuji, Terada Tetsuya, Haginomori Shin-Ichi, Kurisu Yoshitaka, Hirose Yoshinobu. Values of fine-needle aspiration cytology of parotid gland tumors: A review of 996 cases at a single institution.. Head & neck. 2018. DOI: 10.1002/hed.25503.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.