Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2011
[Quality evaluation of randomized controlled trials on treatment of cognitive-behavioral therapy on temporomandibular disorders].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liang Qiujuan, Gulibaha Maimaitili, Liu Haixia, Han Liang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate methodological and reporting quality of the randomized controlled trials on cognitive-behavioral therapy(CBT) on temporomandibular disorders(TMD).
METHODS: The electronic databases of Medline via Ovid, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, CBM and CNKI, and five Chinese stomatological journals were included to collect randomized controlled trial(RCT) and quasi-RCT(qRCT) on CBT on TMD. Data were assessed using the quality assessment criteria recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration, and the reporting quality was assessed using the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) checklist.
RESULTS: 232 articles were collected by the search strategy, of which 5 (3 RCTs and 2 qRCTs) met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality varied among the studies with 2 scored as B and 3 as C. The highest score evaluated by the CONSORT checklist was 24.
CONCLUSION: The methodological qualities of included studies on CBT on TMD are generally low, and its reporting quality which is checked by CONSORT is also unsatisfactory yet.
METHODS: The electronic databases of Medline via Ovid, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, CBM and CNKI, and five Chinese stomatological journals were included to collect randomized controlled trial(RCT) and quasi-RCT(qRCT) on CBT on TMD. Data were assessed using the quality assessment criteria recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration, and the reporting quality was assessed using the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) checklist.
RESULTS: 232 articles were collected by the search strategy, of which 5 (3 RCTs and 2 qRCTs) met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality varied among the studies with 2 scored as B and 3 as C. The highest score evaluated by the CONSORT checklist was 24.
CONCLUSION: The methodological qualities of included studies on CBT on TMD are generally low, and its reporting quality which is checked by CONSORT is also unsatisfactory yet.