Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
Comparative study of the short-term outcomes of gastric cancer surgery between Japanese Gastric cancer association-certified and non-certified institutions: a retrospective cohort analysis using a national database in Japan.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Matsunaga Tomoyuki, Endo Hideki, Yamamoto Hiroyuki, Kumagai Koshi, Kanaji Shingo, Kawakami Hisato, Kusano Chika, Kushima Ryoji, Fujishiro Mitsuhiro, Yamaguchi Kensei, Yoshikawa Takaki, Doki Yuichiro, Kakeji Yoshihiro, Fujiwara Yoshiyuki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study assessed the impact of an institutional certification system that was newly introduced by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association on short-term surgical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer using data from the National Clinical Database.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of distal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy procedures performed between January 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. The institutions were classified into three categories: type A, type B, and non-certified institutions, in decreasing order of certification stringency. The primary outcome was the incidence of grade ≥ IIIa postoperative complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The secondary outcome was surgery-related mortality. Logistic regression with risk adjustment, estimated using generalized estimating equations, was used to account for intra-cluster correlation.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the risks of distal gastrectomy-related complications across the three institution types. However, type A- (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.49) and type B-certified institutions (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.49-0.71) had a significantly lower mortality risk than non-certified ones. On the other hand, Type A- (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.44) and type B-certified institutions (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.33) had higher risks of postoperative total gastrectomy-related complications than non-certified ones. Nevertheless, type A- (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.29-0.58) and type B-certified institutions (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.88) had significantly lower surgery-related mortality risks than non-certified ones.
CONCLUSIONS: Certified institutions demonstrated lower surgical mortality risks, highlighting the benefits of the certification system and the importance of institutional quality.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of distal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy procedures performed between January 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. The institutions were classified into three categories: type A, type B, and non-certified institutions, in decreasing order of certification stringency. The primary outcome was the incidence of grade ≥ IIIa postoperative complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The secondary outcome was surgery-related mortality. Logistic regression with risk adjustment, estimated using generalized estimating equations, was used to account for intra-cluster correlation.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the risks of distal gastrectomy-related complications across the three institution types. However, type A- (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.49) and type B-certified institutions (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.49-0.71) had a significantly lower mortality risk than non-certified ones. On the other hand, Type A- (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.44) and type B-certified institutions (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.33) had higher risks of postoperative total gastrectomy-related complications than non-certified ones. Nevertheless, type A- (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.29-0.58) and type B-certified institutions (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.88) had significantly lower surgery-related mortality risks than non-certified ones.
CONCLUSIONS: Certified institutions demonstrated lower surgical mortality risks, highlighting the benefits of the certification system and the importance of institutional quality.