MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10120-025-01694-8

Медицинская библиотека · Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026

Comparative study of the short-term outcomes of gastric cancer surgery between Japanese Gastric cancer association-certified and non-certified institutions: a retrospective cohort analysis using a national database in Japan.

Matsunaga Tomoyuki, Endo Hideki, Yamamoto Hiroyuki, Kumagai Koshi, Kanaji Shingo, Kawakami Hisato, Kusano Chika, Kushima Ryoji, Fujishiro Mitsuhiro, Yamaguchi Kensei, Yoshikawa Takaki, Doki Yuichiro, Kakeji Yoshihiro, Fujiwara Yoshiyuki

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the impact of an institutional certification system that was newly introduced by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association on short-term surgical outcomes in patients with gastric cancer using data from the National Clinical Database.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of distal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy procedures performed between January 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. The institutions were classified into three categories: type A, type B, and non-certified institutions, in decreasing order of certification stringency. The primary outcome was the incidence of grade ≥ IIIa postoperative complications based on the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The secondary outcome was surgery-related mortality. Logistic regression with risk adjustment, estimated using generalized estimating equations, was used to account for intra-cluster correlation.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the risks of distal gastrectomy-related complications across the three institution types. However, type A- (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.49) and type B-certified institutions (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.49-0.71) had a significantly lower mortality risk than non-certified ones. On the other hand, Type A- (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.44) and type B-certified institutions (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.33) had higher risks of postoperative total gastrectomy-related complications than non-certified ones. Nevertheless, type A- (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.29-0.58) and type B-certified institutions (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.88) had significantly lower surgery-related mortality risks than non-certified ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Certified institutions demonstrated lower surgical mortality risks, highlighting the benefits of the certification system and the importance of institutional quality.

Для цитирования: Matsunaga Tomoyuki, Endo Hideki, Yamamoto Hiroyuki, Kumagai Koshi, Kanaji Shingo, Kawakami Hisato, Kusano Chika, Kushima Ryoji, Fujishiro Mitsuhiro, Yamaguchi Kensei, Yoshikawa Takaki, Doki Yuichiro, Kakeji Yoshihiro, Fujiwara Yoshiyuki. Comparative study of the short-term outcomes of gastric cancer surgery between Japanese Gastric cancer association-certified and non-certified institutions: a retrospective cohort analysis using a national database in Japan.. Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-025-01694-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.