The British journal of surgery · 2007
Feasibility of minimally invasive approaches in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Besselink M G, van Santvoort H C, Schaapherder A F, van Ramshorst B, van Goor H, Gooszen H G, Dutch Acute Pancreatitis Study Group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive procedures to treat infected necrotizing pancreatitis (INP) are gaining popularity. The proportion of patients suitable for this approach remains unknown.
METHODS: Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed from 106 consecutive patients who had surgery for INP between 2000 and 2003 in 11 Dutch hospitals. Collections related to the pancreas were classified according to their distance from the left abdominal wall. Five radiologists judged 'accessibility' for drain placement and the likelihood that there was a fluid component that would drain ('drainability'). Agreement between radiologists was determined.
RESULTS: CT scans of 80 (75 per cent) patients were available (59 men; age range 29-80 years). The median interval between hospital admission and preoperative CT scan was 20 days. In 55 (69 per cent) patients, the lateral border of the collection was less than 5 cm from the left abdominal wall. Placement of a drain was deemed feasible in 67 (84 (range 77-89) per cent) patients; mean(s.d.) kappa 0.428(0.096). In 45 (56 per cent) patients, a drain could be placed through the left retroperitoneum. In 43 (54 (range 49-82) per cent) patients, collections were judged to contain a drainable fluid component. Interobserver agreement on 'drainability' was poor, mean(s.d.) kappa 0.289(0.101).
CONCLUSION: Most peripancreatic collections in INP were considered accessible to a minimally invasive approach.
METHODS: Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were reviewed from 106 consecutive patients who had surgery for INP between 2000 and 2003 in 11 Dutch hospitals. Collections related to the pancreas were classified according to their distance from the left abdominal wall. Five radiologists judged 'accessibility' for drain placement and the likelihood that there was a fluid component that would drain ('drainability'). Agreement between radiologists was determined.
RESULTS: CT scans of 80 (75 per cent) patients were available (59 men; age range 29-80 years). The median interval between hospital admission and preoperative CT scan was 20 days. In 55 (69 per cent) patients, the lateral border of the collection was less than 5 cm from the left abdominal wall. Placement of a drain was deemed feasible in 67 (84 (range 77-89) per cent) patients; mean(s.d.) kappa 0.428(0.096). In 45 (56 per cent) patients, a drain could be placed through the left retroperitoneum. In 43 (54 (range 49-82) per cent) patients, collections were judged to contain a drainable fluid component. Interobserver agreement on 'drainability' was poor, mean(s.d.) kappa 0.289(0.101).
CONCLUSION: Most peripancreatic collections in INP were considered accessible to a minimally invasive approach.