MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.036

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2021

Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic myomectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

Song Taejong, Kang Du-Young

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic myomectomy.

STUDY

DESIGN

A total of 64 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids were randomly assigned to either the 3D (n = 32) group or the 2D group (n = 32). The primary outcomes were the operative blood loss and change in hemoglobin levels. The secondary outcome was operative time.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the baseline demographics between the two groups. The 3D and 2D groups were not significantly different in terms of operative blood loss (129.5 ± 86.5 mL vs. 140.9 ± 89.8 mL, P = 0.412), change in serum hemoglobin levels (1.4 ± 1.6 g/dL vs. 1.6 ± 1.6 g/dL, P = 0.553), and operative time (77.4 ± 37.8 min vs. 82.4 ± 35.4 min, P = 0.344). Furthermore, no differences were observed between the groups with regard to other surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The 3D imaging system had no additional surgical benefit in laparoscopic myomectomy compared with to the conventional 2D imaging system.

Для цитирования: Song Taejong, Kang Du-Young. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic myomectomy: A randomized controlled trial.. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.036.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.