Medical physics · 2021
Male pelvic multi-organ segmentation on transrectal ultrasound using anchor-free mask CNN.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lei Yang, Wang Tonghe, Roper Justin, Jani Ashesh B, Patel Sagar A, Curran Walter J, Patel Pretesh, Liu Tian, Yang Xiaofeng
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Current prostate brachytherapy uses transrectal ultrasound images for implant guidance, where contours of the prostate and organs-at-risk are necessary for treatment planning and dose evaluation. This work aims to develop a deep learning-based method for male pelvic multi-organ segmentation on transrectal ultrasound images.
METHODS: We developed an anchor-free mask convolutional neural network (CNN) that consists of three subnetworks, that is, a backbone, a fully convolutional one-state object detector (FCOS), and a mask head. The backbone extracts multi-level and multi-scale features from an ultrasound (US) image. The FOCS utilizes these features to detect and label (classify) the volume-of-interests (VOIs) of organs. In contrast to the design of a previously investigated mask regional CNN (Mask R-CNN), the FCOS is anchor-free, which can capture the spatial correlation of multiple organs. The mask head performs segmentation on each detected VOI, where a spatial attention strategy is integrated into the mask head to focus on informative feature elements and suppress noise. For evaluation, we retrospectively investigated 83 prostate cancer patients by fivefold cross-validation and a hold-out test. The prostate, bladder, rectum, and urethra were segmented and compared with manual contours using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95 ), mean surface distance (MSD), center of mass distance (CMD), and volume difference (VD).
RESULTS: The proposed method visually outperforms two competing methods, showing better agreement with manual contours and fewer misidentified speckles. In the cross-validation study, the respective DSC and HD95 results were as follows for each organ: bladder 0.75 ± 0.12, 2.58 ± 0.7 mm; prostate 0.93 ± 0.03, 2.28 ± 0.64 mm; rectum 0.90 ± 0.07, 1.65 ± 0.52 mm; and urethra 0.86 ± 0.07, 1.85 ± 1.71 mm. For the hold-out tests, the DSC and HD95 results were as follows: bladder 0.76 ± 0.13, 2.93 ± 1.29 mm; prostate 0.94 ± 0.03, 2.27 ± 0.79 mm; rectum 0.92 ± 0.03, 1.90 ± 0.28 mm; and urethra 0.85 ± 0.06, 1.81 ± 0.72 mm. Segmentation was performed in under 5 seconds.
CONCLUSION: The proposed method demonstrated fast and accurate multi-organ segmentation performance. It can expedite the contouring step of prostate brachytherapy and potentially enable auto-planning and auto-evaluation.
METHODS: We developed an anchor-free mask convolutional neural network (CNN) that consists of three subnetworks, that is, a backbone, a fully convolutional one-state object detector (FCOS), and a mask head. The backbone extracts multi-level and multi-scale features from an ultrasound (US) image. The FOCS utilizes these features to detect and label (classify) the volume-of-interests (VOIs) of organs. In contrast to the design of a previously investigated mask regional CNN (Mask R-CNN), the FCOS is anchor-free, which can capture the spatial correlation of multiple organs. The mask head performs segmentation on each detected VOI, where a spatial attention strategy is integrated into the mask head to focus on informative feature elements and suppress noise. For evaluation, we retrospectively investigated 83 prostate cancer patients by fivefold cross-validation and a hold-out test. The prostate, bladder, rectum, and urethra were segmented and compared with manual contours using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95 ), mean surface distance (MSD), center of mass distance (CMD), and volume difference (VD).
RESULTS: The proposed method visually outperforms two competing methods, showing better agreement with manual contours and fewer misidentified speckles. In the cross-validation study, the respective DSC and HD95 results were as follows for each organ: bladder 0.75 ± 0.12, 2.58 ± 0.7 mm; prostate 0.93 ± 0.03, 2.28 ± 0.64 mm; rectum 0.90 ± 0.07, 1.65 ± 0.52 mm; and urethra 0.86 ± 0.07, 1.85 ± 1.71 mm. For the hold-out tests, the DSC and HD95 results were as follows: bladder 0.76 ± 0.13, 2.93 ± 1.29 mm; prostate 0.94 ± 0.03, 2.27 ± 0.79 mm; rectum 0.92 ± 0.03, 1.90 ± 0.28 mm; and urethra 0.85 ± 0.06, 1.81 ± 0.72 mm. Segmentation was performed in under 5 seconds.
CONCLUSION: The proposed method demonstrated fast and accurate multi-organ segmentation performance. It can expedite the contouring step of prostate brachytherapy and potentially enable auto-planning and auto-evaluation.