Current eye research · 2019
Effect of UV-absorbing Contact Lenses on Conjunctival Ultraviolet Autofluorescence.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Haworth Kristina, Belair Christianne
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The intended purpose of UV-absorbing contact lenses is to protect the cornea and posterior ocular structures from UV-induced damage. Few studies report conjunctival effects of UV-absorbing contact lens materials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate conjunctival ultraviolet autofluorescence (UVAF) for contact lens wearers of UV-absorbing and minimally UV-absorbing materials.
METHODS: Forty-four volunteers enrolled in the cross-sectional study. Three groups were recruited; non-contact lens wearers (n = 15), minimally UV-absorbing contact lens wearers (n = 15), and UV-absorbing contact lens wearers (n = 14). Ocular sun exposure was calculated using self-reported measures. Conjunctival UVAF images of temporal and nasal conjunctiva, acquired using a Nikon D7000 camera system adapted with appropriate flash and filter system, were analyzed using ImageJ. A sub-group of participants including only subjects with measurable UVAF was analyzed.
RESULTS: No significant differences were present between groups found similar for age, gender, and ocular sun exposure. The area of UVAF significantly increased following lens removal for UV-absorbing contact lens wearers compared with non-contact lens wearers. Furthermore, for contact lens wearers compared with non-lens wearers, area of UVAF was significantly greater between right and left eyes (p = .04 minimally UV-absorbing, p = .01 UV-absorbing), and between nasal (p = .046 minimally UV-absorbing, p = .01 UV-absorbing), and temporal (p = .01 UV-absorbing) areas. However, no significant difference was found between contact lens wearers of the two groups. No difference was found between nasal and temporal UVAF regions during contact lens wear (p = .28) or after lens removal (p = .16) (Mann-Whitney U).
CONCLUSIONS: Contact lens materials have conjunctival effects, with increased UVAF in both UV-absorbing and minimally UV-absorbing contact lens wearers compared with non-lens wearers. UV-absorbing and minimally UV-absorbing contact lens materials appear to influence nasal and temporal areas of the ocular surface equally.
METHODS: Forty-four volunteers enrolled in the cross-sectional study. Three groups were recruited; non-contact lens wearers (n = 15), minimally UV-absorbing contact lens wearers (n = 15), and UV-absorbing contact lens wearers (n = 14). Ocular sun exposure was calculated using self-reported measures. Conjunctival UVAF images of temporal and nasal conjunctiva, acquired using a Nikon D7000 camera system adapted with appropriate flash and filter system, were analyzed using ImageJ. A sub-group of participants including only subjects with measurable UVAF was analyzed.
RESULTS: No significant differences were present between groups found similar for age, gender, and ocular sun exposure. The area of UVAF significantly increased following lens removal for UV-absorbing contact lens wearers compared with non-contact lens wearers. Furthermore, for contact lens wearers compared with non-lens wearers, area of UVAF was significantly greater between right and left eyes (p = .04 minimally UV-absorbing, p = .01 UV-absorbing), and between nasal (p = .046 minimally UV-absorbing, p = .01 UV-absorbing), and temporal (p = .01 UV-absorbing) areas. However, no significant difference was found between contact lens wearers of the two groups. No difference was found between nasal and temporal UVAF regions during contact lens wear (p = .28) or after lens removal (p = .16) (Mann-Whitney U).
CONCLUSIONS: Contact lens materials have conjunctival effects, with increased UVAF in both UV-absorbing and minimally UV-absorbing contact lens wearers compared with non-lens wearers. UV-absorbing and minimally UV-absorbing contact lens materials appear to influence nasal and temporal areas of the ocular surface equally.