Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2014
Lupus-like membranous nephropathy: Is it lupus or not?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sam Ramin, Joshi Amit, James Sam, Jen Kuang-Yu, Amani Firouz, Hart Peter, Schwartz Melvin M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Membranous glomerulonephritis is typically classified as idiopathic or secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), hepatitis B, drugs, toxins, other infections, or malignancy. Not infrequently in some patients without a definite diagnosis of SLE, pathologic features of secondary membranous nephropathy are seen e.g., mesangial and/or subendothelial deposits, tubuloreticular inclusions, and full house immunofluorescence. In these patients, there is uncertainty about the etiology, response to therapy, and prognosis of membranous GN.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 98 patients with membranous GN at San Francisco General Hospital and John Stroger Hospital of Cook County over a 10-year period. Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS.18.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine (40 %) had idiopathic membranous GN (Group 1), thirty-six (37 %) had lupus membranous GN (Group 2) and twenty-three (23 %) had some pathological features of secondary membranous GN, but no definite etiology of membranous GN (Group 3). At baseline (at time of renal biopsy) and after mean follow-up of 3.5 years, the average serum creatinine (in mg/dL) in Group 1 was (1.6 ± 1.0 versus 1.6 ± 1.7), Group 2 was (1.8 ± 2.5 versus 1.2 ± 0.9) and Group 3 was (1.1 ± 0.4 versus 1.27 ± 0.83), respectively. For the same time points, the average urine protein to creatinine ratio (g/g) in Group 1 was (9.8 ± 7.1 versus 5.7 ± 6.7), Group 2 was (4.2 ± 3.9 versus 1.7 ± 2.2), and Group 3 was (7.4 ± 5.7 versus 3.1 ± 3.8). In addition, during the follow-up period, eleven of 39 (28 %) in Group 1, two of 36 (6 %) in Group 2, and three of 23 (13 %) in Group 3 progressed to end-stage renal disease and were started on dialysis.
CONCLUSIONS: It appears that patients with lupus membranous GN have better renal prognosis than patients with idiopathic membranous GN. The renal prognosis for patients with pathological features of lupus membranous but no diagnosis of systemic lupus (lupus-like membranous GN) falls in between. Further studies are needed to determine if Group 3 patients can (a) definitively be classified as true idiopathic membranous GN or lupus membranous GN or (b) they have a separate disease from either M-type phospholipase A2 receptor membranous nephropathy or systemic lupus-induced membranous nephropathy.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 98 patients with membranous GN at San Francisco General Hospital and John Stroger Hospital of Cook County over a 10-year period. Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS.18.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine (40 %) had idiopathic membranous GN (Group 1), thirty-six (37 %) had lupus membranous GN (Group 2) and twenty-three (23 %) had some pathological features of secondary membranous GN, but no definite etiology of membranous GN (Group 3). At baseline (at time of renal biopsy) and after mean follow-up of 3.5 years, the average serum creatinine (in mg/dL) in Group 1 was (1.6 ± 1.0 versus 1.6 ± 1.7), Group 2 was (1.8 ± 2.5 versus 1.2 ± 0.9) and Group 3 was (1.1 ± 0.4 versus 1.27 ± 0.83), respectively. For the same time points, the average urine protein to creatinine ratio (g/g) in Group 1 was (9.8 ± 7.1 versus 5.7 ± 6.7), Group 2 was (4.2 ± 3.9 versus 1.7 ± 2.2), and Group 3 was (7.4 ± 5.7 versus 3.1 ± 3.8). In addition, during the follow-up period, eleven of 39 (28 %) in Group 1, two of 36 (6 %) in Group 2, and three of 23 (13 %) in Group 3 progressed to end-stage renal disease and were started on dialysis.
CONCLUSIONS: It appears that patients with lupus membranous GN have better renal prognosis than patients with idiopathic membranous GN. The renal prognosis for patients with pathological features of lupus membranous but no diagnosis of systemic lupus (lupus-like membranous GN) falls in between. Further studies are needed to determine if Group 3 patients can (a) definitively be classified as true idiopathic membranous GN or lupus membranous GN or (b) they have a separate disease from either M-type phospholipase A2 receptor membranous nephropathy or systemic lupus-induced membranous nephropathy.