A comparison of MR elastography and 31P MR spectroscopy with histological staging of liver fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES

Conventional imaging techniques are insensitive to liver fibrosis. This study assesses the diagnostic accuracy of MR elastography (MRE) stiffness values and the ratio of phosphomonoesters (PME)/phosphodiesters (PDE) measured using (31)P spectroscopy against histological fibrosis staging.

METHODS

The local research ethics committee approved this prospective, blinded study. A total of 77 consecutive patients (55 male, aged 49 ± 11.5 years) with a clinical suspicion of liver fibrosis underwent an MR examination with a liver biopsy later the same day. Patients underwent MRE and (31)P spectroscopy on a 1.5 T whole body system. The liver biopsies were staged using an Ishak score for chronic hepatitis or a modified NAS fibrosis score for fatty liver disease.

RESULTS

MRE increased with and was positively associated with fibrosis stage (Spearman's rank = 0.622, P < 0.001). PME/PDE was not associated with fibrosis stage (Spearman's rank = -0.041, p = 0.741). Area under receiver operating curves for MRE stiffness values were high (range 0.75-0.97). The diagnostic utility of PME/PDE was no better than chance (range 0.44-0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

MRE-estimated liver stiffness increases with fibrosis stage and is able to dichotomise fibrosis stage groupings. We did not find a relationship between (31)P MR spectroscopy and fibrosis stage.

KEY POINTS: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and MR spectroscopy can both assess the liver. MRE is superior to ( 31 ) P MR spectroscopy in staging hepatic fibrosis. MRE is able to dichotomise liver fibrosis stage groupings. Gradient-echo MRE may be problematic in genetic haemochromatosis.