Hepato-gastroenterology · 2006
Split liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sotiropoulos Georgios C, Lang Hauke, Frühauf Nils R, Molmenti Ernesto P, Omar Omar S, Radtke Arnold, Paul Andreas, Nadalin Silvio, Frilling Andrea, Broelsch Christoph E, Malagò Massimo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Liver transplantation (LTx) is recognized as the treatment of choice for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) in patients with end-stage liver failure. However, because of limited organ availability, not all those who qualify can benefit from full-size LTx.
METHODOLOGY: Over a 28-month period, we transplanted 6 deceased donor split liver allografts in stable recipients with HCC and cirrhosis.
RESULTS: There were 5 men and one woman with a median age of 60 years. Median waiting time to LTx was 82 days. Extended right split grafts (segments I, IV-VIII) were transplanted in 5 patients. One patient received a right split graft. In situ harvesting was performed in 4 instances and ex situ in the remaining 2. Median cold ischemia time was 10 hours. Primary non-function was not observed. Median intensive care unit stay was 4 days. There were neither vascular nor biliary complications. The postoperative course was uneventful in half of the patients. Two patients were re-operated because of an abscess caused by a liver necrosis in the marginal zone of segment IV. One patient died for reasons unrelated to liver function or to the surgical intervention. The remaining 5 patients are alive after a median follow-up of 20 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Deceased donor split LTx constitutes an additional option for patients with HCC and cirrhosis. The potential risks of using "split livers" as well as the potential benefits of transplanting patients unlikely to survive the waiting list period must be evaluated on an individual basis.
METHODOLOGY: Over a 28-month period, we transplanted 6 deceased donor split liver allografts in stable recipients with HCC and cirrhosis.
RESULTS: There were 5 men and one woman with a median age of 60 years. Median waiting time to LTx was 82 days. Extended right split grafts (segments I, IV-VIII) were transplanted in 5 patients. One patient received a right split graft. In situ harvesting was performed in 4 instances and ex situ in the remaining 2. Median cold ischemia time was 10 hours. Primary non-function was not observed. Median intensive care unit stay was 4 days. There were neither vascular nor biliary complications. The postoperative course was uneventful in half of the patients. Two patients were re-operated because of an abscess caused by a liver necrosis in the marginal zone of segment IV. One patient died for reasons unrelated to liver function or to the surgical intervention. The remaining 5 patients are alive after a median follow-up of 20 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Deceased donor split LTx constitutes an additional option for patients with HCC and cirrhosis. The potential risks of using "split livers" as well as the potential benefits of transplanting patients unlikely to survive the waiting list period must be evaluated on an individual basis.