Pharmaceutical research · 2024
Dissolution Profiles of Immediate Release Products of Various Drugs in Biorelevant Bicarbonate Buffer: Comparison with Compendial Phosphate Buffer.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Okamoto Nanami, Higashino Masaki, Yamamoto Hibiki, Sugano Kiyohiko
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to clarify the extent to which the dissolution profiles of immediate release (IR) products of various drugs differ between biorelevant bicarbonate buffer (BCB) and compendial phosphate buffer (PPB).
METHODS: The dissolution profiles of the IR products of fifteen poorly soluble ionizable drugs were measured in BCB and PPB. BCB was set to be relevant to the small intestine (pH 6.8, 10 mM). The pH was maintained using the floating lid method. The Japanese pharmacopeia second fluid (JP2, 25 mM phosphate buffer, nominal pH 6.8) was used as compendial PPB. The compendial paddle apparatus was used for the dissolution tests (500 mL, 50 rpm, 37°C).
RESULTS: In 11/15 cases, a difference in dissolved% (< 0.8 or > 1.25-fold) was observed at a time point. In 4/15 cases, the ratio of the area under the dissolution curve was not equivalent (< 0.8 or > 1.25-fold). In the cases of free-form drugs, the dissolution rate tended to be slower in BCB than in JP2. In the case of salt-form drugs, a marked difference was observed for the cases that showed supersaturation. However, no trend was observed in the differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Many IR products showed differences in the dissolution profiles between biorelevant BCB and compendial PPB. With the floating lid method, BCB is as simple and easy to use as PPB. Biorelevant BCB is recommended for dissolution testing.
METHODS: The dissolution profiles of the IR products of fifteen poorly soluble ionizable drugs were measured in BCB and PPB. BCB was set to be relevant to the small intestine (pH 6.8, 10 mM). The pH was maintained using the floating lid method. The Japanese pharmacopeia second fluid (JP2, 25 mM phosphate buffer, nominal pH 6.8) was used as compendial PPB. The compendial paddle apparatus was used for the dissolution tests (500 mL, 50 rpm, 37°C).
RESULTS: In 11/15 cases, a difference in dissolved% (< 0.8 or > 1.25-fold) was observed at a time point. In 4/15 cases, the ratio of the area under the dissolution curve was not equivalent (< 0.8 or > 1.25-fold). In the cases of free-form drugs, the dissolution rate tended to be slower in BCB than in JP2. In the case of salt-form drugs, a marked difference was observed for the cases that showed supersaturation. However, no trend was observed in the differences.
CONCLUSIONS: Many IR products showed differences in the dissolution profiles between biorelevant BCB and compendial PPB. With the floating lid method, BCB is as simple and easy to use as PPB. Biorelevant BCB is recommended for dissolution testing.