Journal of oral biosciences · 2024
Platelet-rich fibrin as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in treatment of shallow periodontal pockets: A randomized clinical trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Al-Rihaymee Sarah, Mahmood Maha Sh, Abdulbaqi Hayder R, Majeed Zeyad Nazar
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (ScRp) for healing shallow periodontal pockets.
METHODS: Twelve patients with periodontitis were enrolled in this split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. A total of 24 shallow periodontal pockets (4-6 mm) were treated by either ScRp alone (control) or PRF (test). Clinical attachment loss (CAL), probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque index (PLI), as well as platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were measured at baseline and at 1- and 3-month follow-up visits.
RESULTS: At 1- and 3-month follow-up visits, greater CAL gains (2.6 ± 0.25 mm and 3.26 ± 0.31 mm, respectively) and PPD reductions (2.58 ± 0.38 and 3.31 ± 0.39 mm, respectively) were observed in the test group compared to those in controls (CAL gain of 1.01 ± 0.49 mm and 1.43 ± 0.48 mm; PPD reduction of 1.1 ± 0.55 and 1.37 ± 0.49 mm, respectively). In addition, the increase in PDGF-BB in GCF in the test group (724.5 ± 186.09 pg/μl and 1957.5 ± 472.9 pg/μl) was significantly greater than that in controls (109.3 ± 24.07 and 614.64 ± 209.3 pg/μl) at 1- and 3-month follow-up visits, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The noninvasive use of PRF as an adjunct to ScRp successfully improved clinical periodontal parameters and might contribute to increased PDGF-BB in GCF.
METHODS: Twelve patients with periodontitis were enrolled in this split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. A total of 24 shallow periodontal pockets (4-6 mm) were treated by either ScRp alone (control) or PRF (test). Clinical attachment loss (CAL), probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque index (PLI), as well as platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were measured at baseline and at 1- and 3-month follow-up visits.
RESULTS: At 1- and 3-month follow-up visits, greater CAL gains (2.6 ± 0.25 mm and 3.26 ± 0.31 mm, respectively) and PPD reductions (2.58 ± 0.38 and 3.31 ± 0.39 mm, respectively) were observed in the test group compared to those in controls (CAL gain of 1.01 ± 0.49 mm and 1.43 ± 0.48 mm; PPD reduction of 1.1 ± 0.55 and 1.37 ± 0.49 mm, respectively). In addition, the increase in PDGF-BB in GCF in the test group (724.5 ± 186.09 pg/μl and 1957.5 ± 472.9 pg/μl) was significantly greater than that in controls (109.3 ± 24.07 and 614.64 ± 209.3 pg/μl) at 1- and 3-month follow-up visits, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The noninvasive use of PRF as an adjunct to ScRp successfully improved clinical periodontal parameters and might contribute to increased PDGF-BB in GCF.