DOI 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000002030
Randomized, controlled crossover comparison of oral cannabidiol with oral opioid for postoperative PRK pain control.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of low-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) oral cannabidiol (CBD) with oral codeine-acetaminophen for postoperative pain control after photorefractive keratectomy.
SETTING
Academic outpatient clinical practice.
DESIGN
Prospective, randomized, crossover, self-controlled clinical trial.
METHODS
35 adults underwent bilateral sequential PRK, receiving oral CBD (50 mg twice daily) for one eye and oral T3 (codeine-acetaminophen 30 to 300 mg every 4 hours) for the contralateral eye in a randomized sequence. Primary outcomes included pain and uncorrected visual acuity at month 3. Secondary outcomes included diary-reported symptoms and patient-reported quality-of-life scores: Patient-Reported Outcomes With LASIK, Quality-of-Life Impact of Refractive Correction, and Ocular Surface Disease Index.
RESULTS
Pain scores peaked on postoperative day 2 across both interventions with no significant difference in mean or maximum pain ratings ( P = .538). Visual acuity improved significantly by postoperative month 3 ( P < .001), with no treatment-related differences ( P = .928). Sensorium was significantly higher when taking CBD for the first eye, and not the second eye, indicating first-exposure effect ( P = .035). Other symptoms and outcomes were equivalent between treatments.
CONCLUSIONS
Low-THC oral CBD provides noninferior pain control to codeine-acetaminophen after PRK with similar recovery outcomes and minimal side effects. Mild sensorium changes may occur in surgically naïve patients taking CBD. CBD may represent a viable opioid-sparing alternative in refractive surgery or acute pain management.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.