Hepatology international · 2024
Prevalence and impact on the outcome of myosteatosis in patients with cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kamiliou Aikaterini, Lekakis Vasileios, Chrysavgis Lampros, Cholongitas Evangelos
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Myosteatosis in cirrhotic patients has been evaluated in limited studies with conflicting results and no systematic review or meta-analysis have been performed in this setting.
METHODS: We searched for all articles published until June 2023 to evaluate the prevalence of myosteatosis in cirrhosis and chronic liver disease.
RESULTS: Seventeen studies focused on cirrhosis and five studies in patients with chronic liver disease were included: the overall pooled prevalence of myosteatosis was 46% [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 36-57%] and 33% (95% CI 15-59%), respectively (p = 0.35). Among the studies with cirrhosis, the prevalence of myosteatosis was higher in those using the body mass index-based definition of myosteatosis (56%), than gender-based (36%) or other criteria (21%) (p < 0.01); was higher in women than in men (61% vs 45%), in Child-Pugh class C than A or B (57% vs 49% vs 50%), in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)- than viral-associated cirrhosis (57% vs 43%), but these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Cirrhotic patients with myosteatosis, compared to those without myosteatosis, had more frequently a previous history of hepatic encephalopathy (32% vs 15%, p = 0.04), less frequently a previous history of variceal bleeding (46% vs 65%, p < 0.01), were more likely to suffer from diabetes mellitus (27% vs 18%, p < 0.01), while they had higher mortality rates (40% vs 14%, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Myosteatosis is highly prevalent in patients with cirrhosis, particularly in those with NAFLD-associated cirrhosis. Myosteatosis is associated with hepatic encephalopathy, while it seems to have a negative impact on the outcome.
METHODS: We searched for all articles published until June 2023 to evaluate the prevalence of myosteatosis in cirrhosis and chronic liver disease.
RESULTS: Seventeen studies focused on cirrhosis and five studies in patients with chronic liver disease were included: the overall pooled prevalence of myosteatosis was 46% [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 36-57%] and 33% (95% CI 15-59%), respectively (p = 0.35). Among the studies with cirrhosis, the prevalence of myosteatosis was higher in those using the body mass index-based definition of myosteatosis (56%), than gender-based (36%) or other criteria (21%) (p < 0.01); was higher in women than in men (61% vs 45%), in Child-Pugh class C than A or B (57% vs 49% vs 50%), in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)- than viral-associated cirrhosis (57% vs 43%), but these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Cirrhotic patients with myosteatosis, compared to those without myosteatosis, had more frequently a previous history of hepatic encephalopathy (32% vs 15%, p = 0.04), less frequently a previous history of variceal bleeding (46% vs 65%, p < 0.01), were more likely to suffer from diabetes mellitus (27% vs 18%, p < 0.01), while they had higher mortality rates (40% vs 14%, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Myosteatosis is highly prevalent in patients with cirrhosis, particularly in those with NAFLD-associated cirrhosis. Myosteatosis is associated with hepatic encephalopathy, while it seems to have a negative impact on the outcome.