International ophthalmology · 2026
Comparative analysis of higher-order aberration profiles in macular and granular corneal dystrophies.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Balıkçı Ayşe Tüfekçi, Burcu Ayşe, Yalnız Akkaya Züleyha, Şingar Evin, Uzman Selma
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare corneal topographic characteristics and higher-order aberration (HOA) profiles between macular corneal dystrophy (MCD) and granular corneal dystrophy (GCD) and to identify phenotype-specific structural determinants of optical degradation.
METHODS: This cross-sectional comparative study included 81 eyes (49 MCD, 32 GCD) evaluated using Scheimpflug-Placido-based tomography. Corneal topographic parameters and wavefront-derived aberrations were analyzed over a 6-mm optical zone. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test with false discovery rate correction. Spearman correlation and multivariable regression analyses were used to assess structural-optical associations.
RESULTS: Patients with GCD were older than those with MCD (p=0.006). MCD eyes demonstrated significantly greater astigmatism (p=0.001), lower corneal volume and central corneal thickness (both p<0.001), and steeper anterior mean keratometry (p<0.001). Total HOA burden was comparable between groups; however, GCD showed significantly higher spherical aberration (p<0.001) and posterior RMS values (p=0.001). Anterior Kmax demonstrated the strongest correlations with total RMS (ρ=0.66), total HOA (ρ=0.75), anterior RMS (ρ=0.67), and anterior HOA (ρ=0.73) (all p<0.01). Multivariable analysis identified anterior Kmax as the strongest independent predictor of multiple aberration parameters, while posterior aberrations showed phenotype-specific associations.
CONCLUSIONS: Although MCD and GCD exhibited similar overall HOA magnitude, they demonstrated distinct aberration profiles and structural-optical relationships. GCD was characterized by increased spherical and posterior aberrations, whereas MCD showed broader associations between structural abnormalities and optical degradation. Phenotype-specific HOA analysis may improve characterization of visual dysfunction and support more individualized management strategies.
METHODS: This cross-sectional comparative study included 81 eyes (49 MCD, 32 GCD) evaluated using Scheimpflug-Placido-based tomography. Corneal topographic parameters and wavefront-derived aberrations were analyzed over a 6-mm optical zone. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test with false discovery rate correction. Spearman correlation and multivariable regression analyses were used to assess structural-optical associations.
RESULTS: Patients with GCD were older than those with MCD (p=0.006). MCD eyes demonstrated significantly greater astigmatism (p=0.001), lower corneal volume and central corneal thickness (both p<0.001), and steeper anterior mean keratometry (p<0.001). Total HOA burden was comparable between groups; however, GCD showed significantly higher spherical aberration (p<0.001) and posterior RMS values (p=0.001). Anterior Kmax demonstrated the strongest correlations with total RMS (ρ=0.66), total HOA (ρ=0.75), anterior RMS (ρ=0.67), and anterior HOA (ρ=0.73) (all p<0.01). Multivariable analysis identified anterior Kmax as the strongest independent predictor of multiple aberration parameters, while posterior aberrations showed phenotype-specific associations.
CONCLUSIONS: Although MCD and GCD exhibited similar overall HOA magnitude, they demonstrated distinct aberration profiles and structural-optical relationships. GCD was characterized by increased spherical and posterior aberrations, whereas MCD showed broader associations between structural abnormalities and optical degradation. Phenotype-specific HOA analysis may improve characterization of visual dysfunction and support more individualized management strategies.