Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2018
Diagnostic performance of a stepwise cytological algorithm for biliary malignancy in primary sclerosing cholangitis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
von Seth Erik, Ouchterlony Helena, Dobra Katalin, Hjerpe Anders, Arnelo Urban, Haas Stephan, Bergquist Annika
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Detection of early cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a stepwise approach to biliary brush cytology with sequential use of fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of biliary malignancy in PSC.
METHOD: We retrospectively studied consecutive patients with PSC who underwent biliary brushings at Karolinska University Hospital between 2009 and 2015 (n = 208). Brush samples were categorized as benign, equivocal (atypical or suspicious) and malignant. Equivocal cases were further analysed with FISH. Samples with a malignant cytology or positive FISH were considered positive. The diagnosis was determined after 12 months of follow-up.
RESULTS: The diagnosis CCA was confirmed in 15 patients (7%), high-grade dysplasia in three patients, and low-grade dysplasia in five patients at follow-up. Using the diagnostic algorithm, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) for a diagnosis of CCA were 80% (95%CI 52%-96%), 96% (95%CI 92%-98%), 60% (95%CI 36%-81%) and 98% (95% CI 95%-100%). In patients with equivocal cytology (n = 61), the sensitivity for CCA diagnosis increased to 100% (95%CI 72%-100%) with a lower PPV of 58% (95%CI 34%-78%). The diagnostic accuracy for detection of CCA in all patients was 95% (95%CI 91%-97%).
CONCLUSION: Biliary brush cytology with sequential use of FISH in equivocal cases seems to be a highly predictive diagnostic test for CCA in PSC. These results support the use of FISH when cytology is equivocal for detection of biliary malignancy in PSC.
METHOD: We retrospectively studied consecutive patients with PSC who underwent biliary brushings at Karolinska University Hospital between 2009 and 2015 (n = 208). Brush samples were categorized as benign, equivocal (atypical or suspicious) and malignant. Equivocal cases were further analysed with FISH. Samples with a malignant cytology or positive FISH were considered positive. The diagnosis was determined after 12 months of follow-up.
RESULTS: The diagnosis CCA was confirmed in 15 patients (7%), high-grade dysplasia in three patients, and low-grade dysplasia in five patients at follow-up. Using the diagnostic algorithm, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) for a diagnosis of CCA were 80% (95%CI 52%-96%), 96% (95%CI 92%-98%), 60% (95%CI 36%-81%) and 98% (95% CI 95%-100%). In patients with equivocal cytology (n = 61), the sensitivity for CCA diagnosis increased to 100% (95%CI 72%-100%) with a lower PPV of 58% (95%CI 34%-78%). The diagnostic accuracy for detection of CCA in all patients was 95% (95%CI 91%-97%).
CONCLUSION: Biliary brush cytology with sequential use of FISH in equivocal cases seems to be a highly predictive diagnostic test for CCA in PSC. These results support the use of FISH when cytology is equivocal for detection of biliary malignancy in PSC.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsBile Duct NeoplasmsBiliary TractBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCholangiocarcinomaCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholangitis, SclerosingCytodiagnosisData AccuracyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSwedenYoung Adult