Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique · 1994
[Variations of plasma gastrin (basal and postprandial) in ththtreatmentof duodenal ulcer with either enprostil or ranitidine. Correlations with rates of relapse].
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bado A, Corrion F, Bernades P, Chevalier T, Galmiche J P, Laverdant C, Mignon M, Minaire Y, Pariente A, Vicari F
Аннотация
Enprostil, a synthetic E2-prostaglandin efficacious for duodenal ulcer healing, presents both antisecretory and antigastrinic effects. This is at variance with the elevation of plasma gastrin observed with ranitidine. OBJECTIVE--This leads us to compare enprostil and ranitidine on the following points: a) variations of plasma gastrin (basal and postprandial) parameters over a 6-week conventional treatment; b) correlation studies between ulcer relapses (frequency and temporal evolution) after treatment discontinuation and various gastrinic criteria. METHODS--Among a group of 642 patients followed for ulcer relapse, 165 were considered for gastrin (78 of the "Enprostil" group and 87 of the "Ranitidine" group). RESULTS--Initially, both populations were comparable for clinical and plasma gastrin parameters. After 6 weeks of treatment, the increases in the various gastrin parameters (basal, postprandial, peak, integraded) were significantly greater and the absolute values higher (Wilcoxon, P < 0.001) with ranitidine than with enprostil. No correlation was found between relapse occurrence after drug discontinuation and these gastrin parameters. CONCLUSIONS--Ranitidine hypergastrinemia seems directly related to gastric hyposecretion whereas its absence with enprostil is likely more dependent upon a specific antigastrinic activity than on a reduced antisecretory activity. Those differences in mechanism of action have no consequence on the stability of ulcer obtained by either drug.