MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i35.11056

Медицинская библиотека · World journal of clinical cases · 2021

Treatment of a giant low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: A case report.

Xu Rong, Yang Zhi-Long

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) is extremely rare and easily misdiagnosed before surgery.

CASE SUMMARY: We report the treatment of an asymptomatic case of LAMN diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical findings. A 70-year-old woman presented with an adnexal mass found by physical examination in July 2020. Gynecologic ultrasonography revealed a cystic mass in the right adnexa, and computed tomography showed a cystic mass in the pelvic cavity. All tumor markers were normal. A further MRI examination suggested mucinous neoplasm in the right pelvic cavity, excluding the possibility of adnexal cyst. Laparoscopic exploration found a huge cystic mass of about 10 cm × 7 cm that originated from the apex of the appendix, with spontaneous rupture. LAMN was confirmed by pathological examination. As of May 2021, no disease recurrence occurred after an open appendectomy.

CONCLUSION

This case indicates that we should pay more attention to female patients who are clinically diagnosed with an adnexal mass at admission,. The physical examination should be done carefully, and the laboratory and imaging examination results should be comprehensively analyzed to avoid misdiagnosis and to ensure prompt diagnosis and treatment, and to improve prognosis. MRI may be a better option for the diagnosis of appendiceal mucinous neoplasm.

Для цитирования: Xu Rong, Yang Zhi-Long. Treatment of a giant low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm: A case report.. World journal of clinical cases. 2021. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i35.11056.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.