Renal failure · 2024
Predictive model of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis: a machine learning approach using the MIMIC-IV database.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lin Shengwei, Lu Wenbin, Wang Ting, Wang Ying, Leng Xueqian, Chi Lidan, Jin Peipei, Bian Jinjun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and serious complication in severe acute pancreatitis (AP), associated with high mortality rate. Early detection of AKI is crucial for prompt intervention and better outcomes. This study aims to develop and validate predictive models using machine learning (ML) to identify the onset of AKI in patients with AP.
METHODS: Patients with AP were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database. We performed feature selection using the random forest method. Model construction involved an ensemble of ML, including random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), naive Bayes (NB), neural network (NNET), generalized linear model (GLM), and gradient boosting machine (GBM). The best-performing model was fine-tuned and evaluated through split-set validation.
RESULTS: We analyzed 1,235 critically ill patients with AP, of which 667 cases (54%) experienced AKI during hospitalization. We used 49 variables to construct models, including GBM, GLM, KNN, NB, NNET, RF, and SVM. The AUC for these models was 0.814 (95% CI, 0.763 to 0.865), 0.812 (95% CI, 0.769 to 0.854), 0.671 (95% CI, 0.622 to 0.719), 0.812 (95% CI, 0.780 to 0.864), 0.688 (95% CI, 0.624 to 0.752), 0.809 (95% CI, 0.766 to 0.851), and 0.810 (95% CI, 0.763 to 0.856) respectively. In the test set, the GBM's performance was consistent, with an area of 0.867 (95% CI, 0.831 to 0.903).
CONCLUSIONS: The GBM model's precision is crucial, aiding clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and enabling timely interventions to reduce mortality rates in critical care.
METHODS: Patients with AP were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database. We performed feature selection using the random forest method. Model construction involved an ensemble of ML, including random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), naive Bayes (NB), neural network (NNET), generalized linear model (GLM), and gradient boosting machine (GBM). The best-performing model was fine-tuned and evaluated through split-set validation.
RESULTS: We analyzed 1,235 critically ill patients with AP, of which 667 cases (54%) experienced AKI during hospitalization. We used 49 variables to construct models, including GBM, GLM, KNN, NB, NNET, RF, and SVM. The AUC for these models was 0.814 (95% CI, 0.763 to 0.865), 0.812 (95% CI, 0.769 to 0.854), 0.671 (95% CI, 0.622 to 0.719), 0.812 (95% CI, 0.780 to 0.864), 0.688 (95% CI, 0.624 to 0.752), 0.809 (95% CI, 0.766 to 0.851), and 0.810 (95% CI, 0.763 to 0.856) respectively. In the test set, the GBM's performance was consistent, with an area of 0.867 (95% CI, 0.831 to 0.903).
CONCLUSIONS: The GBM model's precision is crucial, aiding clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and enabling timely interventions to reduce mortality rates in critical care.