Academic radiology · 2023
Autoimmune Pancreatitis Surveillance: A Simplified MRI Protocol Versus a Comprehensive Pancreatic MRI Protocol.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Jing-Yi, Zhu Liang, Gao Xin, Li Juan, Sun Zhao-Yong, Jin Zheng-Yu, Xue Hua-Dan
Аннотация
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has good diagnostic performance and causes no radiation damage, making it an ideal tool for the autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) surveillance. However, its time cost is high. This study aimed to evaluate (1) whether a simplified protocol (SP) of MRI for AIP surveillance provides information equivalent to the comprehensive protocol (CP) and (2) the time cost reductions associated with using an SP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-institutional study included 40 patients with AIP with at least two contrast-enhanced MRI/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography studies. Two radiologists evaluated two imaging sets (CP/SP) per patient, independently. Intra- and inter-observer agreement in the evaluation of the pancreas and extrapancreatic organs involvement using the SP/CP in addition to the time cost differences between the SP and CP were assessed. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed using Cohen's kappa test, intraclass correlations, or the weighted kappa test. The differences in time costs between the CP and SP were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
RESULTS: The SP had strong intra- and inter-observer agreement with the CP in evaluating MRI parameters (κ ＞ 0.60, moderate to excellent) and disease activity status (κ ＞ 0.80, all excellent). The overall image acquisition time cost for the SP was 49.2% of the CP. For the two radiologists, the image interpretation time cost of the SP was reduced by approximately 35% and 27% compared to the CP.
CONCLUSION: For AIP surveillance, SP MRI provides information consistent with the CP and is less time-consuming.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-institutional study included 40 patients with AIP with at least two contrast-enhanced MRI/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography studies. Two radiologists evaluated two imaging sets (CP/SP) per patient, independently. Intra- and inter-observer agreement in the evaluation of the pancreas and extrapancreatic organs involvement using the SP/CP in addition to the time cost differences between the SP and CP were assessed. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed using Cohen's kappa test, intraclass correlations, or the weighted kappa test. The differences in time costs between the CP and SP were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
RESULTS: The SP had strong intra- and inter-observer agreement with the CP in evaluating MRI parameters (κ ＞ 0.60, moderate to excellent) and disease activity status (κ ＞ 0.80, all excellent). The overall image acquisition time cost for the SP was 49.2% of the CP. For the two radiologists, the image interpretation time cost of the SP was reduced by approximately 35% and 27% compared to the CP.
CONCLUSION: For AIP surveillance, SP MRI provides information consistent with the CP and is less time-consuming.