HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2008
Antecolic gastrointestinal reconstruction with pylorus dilatation. Does it improve delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Manes Konstantinos, Lytras Dimitrios, Avgerinos Costas, Delis Spiros, Dervenis Christos
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study focuses upon prevention of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreaticoduodenectomy using a alternative reconstruction procedure.
METHOD: Forty consecutive patients underwent a typical pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with antecolic reconstruction in a two-year period (January 2002 until January 2004), while a similar group of 40 consecutive patients underwent PPPD with application of pyloric dilatation between January 2004 and January 2006. Early and late complications were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: DGE occurred significantly more often in the group of patients treated by the classical PPPD technique (nine patients -22%) compared with those operated on with the addition of pyloric dilatation technique (two patients -5%) (p<0.05). The incidence of other complications did not differ significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of dilatation may decrease the incidence of DGE after PPPD and facilitates earlier hospital discharge.
METHOD: Forty consecutive patients underwent a typical pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with antecolic reconstruction in a two-year period (January 2002 until January 2004), while a similar group of 40 consecutive patients underwent PPPD with application of pyloric dilatation between January 2004 and January 2006. Early and late complications were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: DGE occurred significantly more often in the group of patients treated by the classical PPPD technique (nine patients -22%) compared with those operated on with the addition of pyloric dilatation technique (two patients -5%) (p<0.05). The incidence of other complications did not differ significantly between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of dilatation may decrease the incidence of DGE after PPPD and facilitates earlier hospital discharge.