MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.vgie.2016.11.001

Медицинская библиотека · VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2016

Underwater endoscopic resection: an alternative for difficult colorectal polyps.

Chaves Dalton Marques, Brito Hélcio Pedrosa, Chaves Lumi Tomishige, Safatle-Ribeiro Adriana Vaz, Fava Gilberto, de Moura Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux, Sugai Beatriz Mônica

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Underwater endoscopic resection can be an alternative to standard resection techniques to remove difficult colorectal polyps. This video shows 4 cases of underwater resection of large colorectal polyps.

METHODS

Underwater resection consists of complete filling of the lumen through the accessory channel, using an infusion pump followed by snare resection of the polyp. We present 4 cases: a 3-cm pseudodepressed laterally spreading tumor (LST) in the sigmoid colon, a 6-cm pedunculated polyp with a thick stalk in the sigmoid, a 7-cm sessile lesion in the midrectum, and a 4-cm LST in the distal rectum close to the dentate line, resected with a monofilament snare or a multifilament snare.

RESULTS

All tumors were successfully resected without any adverse events or residual lesions during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The underwater technique is a good alternative to standard resection techniques to remove difficult colorectal lesions.

Для цитирования: Chaves Dalton Marques, Brito Hélcio Pedrosa, Chaves Lumi Tomishige, Safatle-Ribeiro Adriana Vaz, Fava Gilberto, de Moura Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux, Sugai Beatriz Mônica. Underwater endoscopic resection: an alternative for difficult colorectal polyps.. VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2016.11.001.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.