Annals of surgical oncology · 2002
Clinical utility of positron emission tomography in the diagnosis and management of periampullary neoplasms.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kalady Matthew F, Clary Bryan M, Clark Lisa A, Gottfried Marcia, Rohren Eric M, Coleman R Edward, Pappas Theodore N, Tyler Douglas S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study examined the effect that 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) imaging had on the clinical management of patients with suspected periampullary malignancy.
METHODS: Fifty-four patients with suspected pancreatic neoplasms underwent both whole-body (18)FDG-PET and abdominal computed tomography (CT). Malignant or benign disease was confirmed pathologically in 47 patients.
RESULTS: Of the 41 patients with malignancy, (18)FDG-PET failed to identify the primary tumor in 5 patients. (18)FDG-PET demonstrated increased uptake suggesting primary malignancy in 37 patients. Malignant pathology was confirmed in 36 cases. (18)FDG-PET identified malignant locoregional lymph node metastases in six of ten patients. All nodes identified before surgery by (18)FDG-PET were also seen on preoperative CT. Six patients who were thought to have resectable disease by CT were found to have distant metastasis at laparotomy. (18)FDG-PET did not detect metastasis in any of these cases. Before surgery, (18)FDG-PET identified distant metastases that were not detected by CT in one patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing periampullary malignancy, (18)FDG-PET did not change clinical management in the vast majority of patients previously evaluated by CT. In addition, (18)FDG-PET missed >10% of periampullary malignancies and did not provide the anatomical detail necessary to define unresectabilty.
METHODS: Fifty-four patients with suspected pancreatic neoplasms underwent both whole-body (18)FDG-PET and abdominal computed tomography (CT). Malignant or benign disease was confirmed pathologically in 47 patients.
RESULTS: Of the 41 patients with malignancy, (18)FDG-PET failed to identify the primary tumor in 5 patients. (18)FDG-PET demonstrated increased uptake suggesting primary malignancy in 37 patients. Malignant pathology was confirmed in 36 cases. (18)FDG-PET identified malignant locoregional lymph node metastases in six of ten patients. All nodes identified before surgery by (18)FDG-PET were also seen on preoperative CT. Six patients who were thought to have resectable disease by CT were found to have distant metastasis at laparotomy. (18)FDG-PET did not detect metastasis in any of these cases. Before surgery, (18)FDG-PET identified distant metastases that were not detected by CT in one patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing periampullary malignancy, (18)FDG-PET did not change clinical management in the vast majority of patients previously evaluated by CT. In addition, (18)FDG-PET missed >10% of periampullary malignancies and did not provide the anatomical detail necessary to define unresectabilty.