MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2334/josnusd.18-0109

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of oral science · 2018

A large-scale study of treatment methods for foreign bodies in the maxillary sinus.

Hara Yaeko, Shiratsuchi Hiroshi, Tamagawa Takaaki, Koshi Ryosuke, Miya Chihiro, Nagasaki Maki, Ohyama Tetsuo, Oka Shunichi, Sakashita Hideaki, Kaneko Tadayoshi

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Recently, reports regarding a foreign body in the maxillary sinus have considerably increased, with the majority being iatrogenic cases resulting from dental treatment. This study involves an extensive review of the Japanese literature, including 112 papers from 1978 to 2017. These papers documented total 407 cases of a foreign body in the maxillary sinus. Among the 392 cases for which treatment details were available, the Caldwell-Luc approach was used for 216, the alveolar approach for 116, extraction using nasal endoscopy for 15, and extraction using oral endoscopy for eight. Spontaneous passage occurred in 19 cases, follow-up with medication was used in 17, and "other" was noted in one. This study determined that surgical removal remains the most common method for treating both tooth roots and other foreign bodies and that the Caldwell-Luc approach is used in majority of the surgeries. No marked differences were noted among the removal methods used in relation to the foreign body type.

Для цитирования: Hara Yaeko, Shiratsuchi Hiroshi, Tamagawa Takaaki, Koshi Ryosuke, Miya Chihiro, Nagasaki Maki, Ohyama Tetsuo, Oka Shunichi, Sakashita Hideaki, Kaneko Tadayoshi. A large-scale study of treatment methods for foreign bodies in the maxillary sinus.. Journal of oral science. 2018. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.18-0109.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.