Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology · 2018
Role of vitamin D deficiency as a risk factor for infections in cirrhotic patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ramadan Haidi K, Makhlouf Nahed A, Mahmoud Amal A, Abd Elrhman Mohamed, El-Masry Muhammad Abbas
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Vitamin D plays a role in innate and acquired immunity. The risk for bacterial infections is increased in cirrhotic patients due to low levels of vitamin D. This study aimed to determine serum 25-(OH) vitamin D levels among cirrhotic patients in the presence and absence of infections and correlate this level with liver disease severity.
METHODS: This cross-sectional analytic study recruited 87 hospitalised cirrhotic patients who were divided into the following groups: group with evidence of infection (45 cases) and group without infection (42 cases). Urine analysis, ascetic fluid study and chest X-rays were performed to find the site of infection. Serum 25-(OH) vitamin D was also measured.
RESULTS: Vitamin D levels were lower in the cirrhotic with infection group than in the cirrhotic without infection group (17.3 ± 2.5 vs. 41.1 ± 3.1, respectively) (P-value < 0.001). Approximately 71.4% cirrhotic patients without infection had sufficient vitamin D levels, while 60% of cirrhotic patients with infection had insufficient vitamin D levels, and 28.9% had vitamin D deficiency (P-value < 0.001). Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was the most common infection (62.2%). The cutoff point of vitamin D levels for cirrhotic patients with infection was 21 ng/mL.
CONCLUSION: Vitamin D deficiency was found to be an independent predictor of infection in cirrhotic patients suggesting that vitamin D supplementation may be useful in these patients. No significant correlations were found between the vitamin D level and the Child-Pugh class and MELD score among the infected group and non-infected group.
METHODS: This cross-sectional analytic study recruited 87 hospitalised cirrhotic patients who were divided into the following groups: group with evidence of infection (45 cases) and group without infection (42 cases). Urine analysis, ascetic fluid study and chest X-rays were performed to find the site of infection. Serum 25-(OH) vitamin D was also measured.
RESULTS: Vitamin D levels were lower in the cirrhotic with infection group than in the cirrhotic without infection group (17.3 ± 2.5 vs. 41.1 ± 3.1, respectively) (P-value < 0.001). Approximately 71.4% cirrhotic patients without infection had sufficient vitamin D levels, while 60% of cirrhotic patients with infection had insufficient vitamin D levels, and 28.9% had vitamin D deficiency (P-value < 0.001). Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was the most common infection (62.2%). The cutoff point of vitamin D levels for cirrhotic patients with infection was 21 ng/mL.
CONCLUSION: Vitamin D deficiency was found to be an independent predictor of infection in cirrhotic patients suggesting that vitamin D supplementation may be useful in these patients. No significant correlations were found between the vitamin D level and the Child-Pugh class and MELD score among the infected group and non-infected group.