Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology · 2011
[Glidescope: a comparison of percentage of glottic opening score between middle size and large size handles].
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shimada Nobuhiro, Hibayashi Yoshihiro, Seo Norimasa
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the percent of glottic opening score between middle-size (#3) and large-size (#4) handles during laryngoscopy using the GlideScope videolaryngoscope (GVL) in Japanese women.
METHODS: In 80 Japanese women receiving general anesthesia for surgical procedures, laryngoscopy was performed using GVL #3 handle and GVL #4 handle. We compared the percentage of glottic opening score between the two handles on each patient.
RESULTS: The percentage of glottic opening score was higher with GVL #3 handle than with GVL #4 handle [66 +/- 28% (mean +/- SD), vs. 53 +/- 34%, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of GVL #3 handle is recommended for tracheal intubation for Japanese women.
METHODS: In 80 Japanese women receiving general anesthesia for surgical procedures, laryngoscopy was performed using GVL #3 handle and GVL #4 handle. We compared the percentage of glottic opening score between the two handles on each patient.
RESULTS: The percentage of glottic opening score was higher with GVL #3 handle than with GVL #4 handle [66 +/- 28% (mean +/- SD), vs. 53 +/- 34%, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of GVL #3 handle is recommended for tracheal intubation for Japanese women.