Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2011
Long-term efficacy of voice therapy in patients with voice problems after treatment of early glottic cancer.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Gogh Christine D L, Verdonck-de Leeuw Irma M, Langendijk Johannes A, Kuik Dirk J, Mahieu Hans F
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present pilot study is to investigate whether the beneficial short-term effects of voice therapy in patients with voice problems after treatment of early glottic cancer as reported in our earlier study remain present on the long term.
STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective study, 12 patients, selected based on a screening questionnaire about voice problems and randomly assigned for treatment with voice therapy (vs no treatment), were evaluated with a mean of 13 months after finishing voice therapy to evaluate the long-term voice effects.
METHODS: Voice assessment consisted of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and acoustic analyses (percent jitter, percent shimmer, and noise-to-harmonics ratio).
RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed that the beneficial short-term effect on the mean VHI, percent jitter, and shimmer remained stable after more than a year of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides initial evidence that the beneficial effect of voice therapy is not just a short-lived voice improvement but may result in a better voice for a period of at least 1 year. Future long-term randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.
STUDY DESIGN: In this prospective study, 12 patients, selected based on a screening questionnaire about voice problems and randomly assigned for treatment with voice therapy (vs no treatment), were evaluated with a mean of 13 months after finishing voice therapy to evaluate the long-term voice effects.
METHODS: Voice assessment consisted of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and acoustic analyses (percent jitter, percent shimmer, and noise-to-harmonics ratio).
RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed that the beneficial short-term effect on the mean VHI, percent jitter, and shimmer remained stable after more than a year of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides initial evidence that the beneficial effect of voice therapy is not just a short-lived voice improvement but may result in a better voice for a period of at least 1 year. Future long-term randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisability EvaluationEarly Detection of CancerGlottisHumansLaryngeal NeoplasmsLaryngoscopyMiddle AgedNetherlandsPilot ProjectsPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRadiation InjuriesSpeech Production MeasurementSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVoice DisordersVoice QualityVoice Training