MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.21687

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2011

Comparison of different surgical approaches in T2 glottic cancer.

Mantsopoulos Konstantinos, Psychogios Georgios, Koch Michael, Zenk Johannes, Waldfahrer Frank, Iro Heinrich

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the oncologic results of endoscopic and open surgical techniques in treating T2 glottic carcinomas.

METHODS

The medical chart of 354 patients with T2 glottic cancer managed with primary surgery were reviewed. Laser microsurgery and frontolateral partial laryngectomy were compared for disease-specific survival and local control rates, incidence of major complications, and related tracheostomies. Additionally, the influence of the anterior commissure invasion on these oncologic parameters was evaluated.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between the surgical procedures regarding our oncologic parameters. A lower incidence of tracheotomies and complications were comparatively found for laser surgery. Tumor invasion of the anterior commissure did not seem to influence the oncologic results.

CONCLUSION

Transoral surgery seems to be the treatment of choice for T2 glottic cancer. In our view, open partial laryngectomy should be reserved for those cases in which the lesion cannot be adequately exposed by direct microlaryngoscopy.

Для цитирования: Mantsopoulos Konstantinos, Psychogios Georgios, Koch Michael, Zenk Johannes, Waldfahrer Frank, Iro Heinrich. Comparison of different surgical approaches in T2 glottic cancer.. Head & neck. 2011. DOI: 10.1002/hed.21687.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.