MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/hed.21686

Медицинская библиотека · Head & neck · 2011

Transoral laser surgery versus radiotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis for treatment options of T1a glottic cancer.

Abdurehim Yasin, Hua Zhang, Yasin Yalkun, Xukurhan Ayihen, Imam Ilham, Yuqin Fan

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the oncologic and functional outcomes between transoral laser surgery (TLS) and radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

An electronic library search of the relevant English- and Chinese-language literature was conducted. Potentially eligible articles were reviewed. Qualified articles were selected and evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant differences were identified between TLS and RT with respect to local control, overall survival, disease-specific survival, and posttreatment voice quality. However, larynx preservation was significantly higher in patients initially treated with TLS than those initially treated with RT.

CONCLUSIONS

The approach for optimal treatment of T1a glottic cancer remains unanswered. This results from the relatively inconclusive evidence obtained from the current literature. Properly designed, prospective, randomized, or well-controlled studies will be required. Similar methodologies for treatment and reporting need to be established to make a valid and meaningful comparison between studies.

Для цитирования: Abdurehim Yasin, Hua Zhang, Yasin Yalkun, Xukurhan Ayihen, Imam Ilham, Yuqin Fan. Transoral laser surgery versus radiotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis for treatment options of T1a glottic cancer.. Head & neck. 2011. DOI: 10.1002/hed.21686.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.