The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon · 2013
Is a vessel-sealing system useful for resection of anterior mediastinal mass?
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Santini Mario, Fiorelli Alfonso, Vicidomini Giovanni, Messina Gaetana, Accardo Marina
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To valuate if the LigaSure (Valleylab, Boulder, Colorado, United States) vessel-sealing system could reduce operative time, intraoperative blood loss, drainage duration, and hospital stay in patients with anterior mediastinal mass undergoing open resection.
METHODS: Forty consecutive patients having resection of anterior mediastinal mass were randomized into two groups according to whether LigaSure was used (n = 20) or not (n = 20). Tumor size, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, chest tube output and duration, length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were prospectively recorded, then intergroup differences were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Both groups were well matched for age, tumor size, pathologic diagnosis, and incidence of complications. LigaSure significantly reduced operative duration (p < 0.0001) compared with the traditional technique but without leading to any significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.2), chest tube output (p = 0.2) and duration (p = 0.2), and length of hospital stay (p = 0.5).
CONCLUSIONS: The reduced operative time using LigaSure translates into less exposure to general anesthesia, which is particularly important for patients with myasthenia and potentially reducing cost.
METHODS: Forty consecutive patients having resection of anterior mediastinal mass were randomized into two groups according to whether LigaSure was used (n = 20) or not (n = 20). Tumor size, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, chest tube output and duration, length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were prospectively recorded, then intergroup differences were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Both groups were well matched for age, tumor size, pathologic diagnosis, and incidence of complications. LigaSure significantly reduced operative duration (p < 0.0001) compared with the traditional technique but without leading to any significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.2), chest tube output (p = 0.2) and duration (p = 0.2), and length of hospital stay (p = 0.5).
CONCLUSIONS: The reduced operative time using LigaSure translates into less exposure to general anesthesia, which is particularly important for patients with myasthenia and potentially reducing cost.