Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2017
Soft Tissue Changes in Patients Undergoing Intraoral Quadrangular Le Fort II Osteotomy Versus Conventional Le Fort I Osteotomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wagner Florian, Figl Michael, Cede Julia, Schicho Kurt, Sinko Klaus, Klug Clemens
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate soft tissue changes after intraoral quadrangular Le Fort II osteotomy (IOQLFII) and correlate those changes to underlying osseous changes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six non-growing patients with midfacial deficiency and Class III malocclusion were analyzed. A study group of 13 patients who underwent IOQLFII was compared with 13 patients who underwent conventional Le Fort I osteotomy (LFI). After fusion of pre- and postoperative computed tomograms, each patient's hard and corresponding soft tissue changes were measured. Measurement points were defined at 3 levels in the IOQLFII group (infraorbital rim [IR], sinus floor [SF], and lateral incisor tip [LI]) and at 2 levels in the LFI group (SF and LI). Linear models were created to test for correlations between hard and soft tissues.
RESULTS: The slope (a1 coefficient) between anteroposterior hard and soft tissue changes was found to be highly significant at each measurement point for all groups. In the IOQLFII group, soft tissue advancement was 69% (confidence interval [CI], 62 to 77%) of the hard tissue advancement at the IR, 90% (CI, 84 to 96%) at the SF, and 73% (CI, 64 to 82%) at the LI. In the LFI group, the corresponding percentages were 90% (83 to 97%) at SF and 84% (77 to 90%) at LI.
CONCLUSION: IOQLFII results in predictable correction of midfacial deficiency. At the IR, bony advancement always resulted in markedly less soft tissue advancement than at the SF level. These results indicate that the planned infraorbital advancement should not be too conservative because soft tissue changes are smaller in this region.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six non-growing patients with midfacial deficiency and Class III malocclusion were analyzed. A study group of 13 patients who underwent IOQLFII was compared with 13 patients who underwent conventional Le Fort I osteotomy (LFI). After fusion of pre- and postoperative computed tomograms, each patient's hard and corresponding soft tissue changes were measured. Measurement points were defined at 3 levels in the IOQLFII group (infraorbital rim [IR], sinus floor [SF], and lateral incisor tip [LI]) and at 2 levels in the LFI group (SF and LI). Linear models were created to test for correlations between hard and soft tissues.
RESULTS: The slope (a1 coefficient) between anteroposterior hard and soft tissue changes was found to be highly significant at each measurement point for all groups. In the IOQLFII group, soft tissue advancement was 69% (confidence interval [CI], 62 to 77%) of the hard tissue advancement at the IR, 90% (CI, 84 to 96%) at the SF, and 73% (CI, 64 to 82%) at the LI. In the LFI group, the corresponding percentages were 90% (83 to 97%) at SF and 84% (77 to 90%) at LI.
CONCLUSION: IOQLFII results in predictable correction of midfacial deficiency. At the IR, bony advancement always resulted in markedly less soft tissue advancement than at the SF level. These results indicate that the planned infraorbital advancement should not be too conservative because soft tissue changes are smaller in this region.