MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/moo.0000000000000371

Медицинская библиотека · Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery · 2017

Surgical orthodontics.

Strohl Alexis M, Vitkus Lauren

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The article reviews some commonly used orthodontic treatments as well as new strategies to assist in the correction of malocclusion. Many techniques are used in conjunction with surgical intervention and are a necessary compliment to orthognathic surgery. Basic knowledge of these practices will aid in the surgeon's ability to adequately treat the patient.

RECENT FINDINGS: Many orthodontists and surgeons are eliminating presurgical orthodontics to adopt a strategy of 'surgery first' orthodontics in orthognathic surgery. This has the benefit of immediate improvement in facial aesthetics and shorter treatment times. The advent of virtual surgical planning has helped facilitate the development of this new paradigm by making surgical planning faster and easier. Furthermore, using intraoperative surgical navigation is improving overall precision and outcomes.

SUMMARY: A variety of surgical and nonsurgical treatments may be employed in the treatment of malocclusion. It is important to be familiar with all options available and tailor the patient's treatment plan accordingly. Surgery-first orthodontics, intraoperative surgical navigation, virtual surgical planning, and 3D printing are evolving new techniques that are producing shorter treatment times and subsequently improving patient satisfaction without sacrificing long-term stability.

Для цитирования: Strohl Alexis M, Vitkus Lauren. Surgical orthodontics.. Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000371.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.