The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2015
Diagnostic efficacy of 3-D hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography in the detection of tubal occlusion: Systematic meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yu Jiangxiu, Cai Mingjin, Liang Weixiang, Deng Zhifeng, Xie Yinong
Аннотация
AIM: Evaluation of tubal status is critical in the diagnostic work-up of infertile women. The purpose of this study was to explore the diagnostic efficacy of three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (3-D HyCoSy) for tubal occlusion.
METHODS: MedLine, Embase, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, CNKI, Chinese VIP Database, Chinese Wanfang Database and Chinese Biomedicine Database were searched for relevant trials published from June 1994 to August 2013. Meta-DiSc (version 1.4) was used for the meta-analysis. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity, as well as area under the curve (AUC) and the pooled diagnostic accuracy (Q*) derived from a summary receiver operating characteristic analysis. The heterogeneity test was done using the Cochran Q statistic and the I(2) statistic. Significant difference was defined as P < 0.10 (Q-statistic) or I(2) > 50% (I(2) -statistic) and a random effect model was used to pool data, otherwise the fixed effects model was used.
RESULTS: A total of 11 studies (1037 Fallopian tubes) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimates for diagnostic efficacy of 3-D HyCoSy had a sensitivity of 0.92 (95%CI: 0.89-0.94) and specificity of 0.95 (95%CI: 0.93-0.96). AUC and Q* were 0.976 and 0.929, respectively, but there was significant heterogeneity in sensitivity across the included studies.
CONCLUSIONS: 3-D HyCoSy had good diagnostic performance in the detection of tubal occlusion.
METHODS: MedLine, Embase, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, CNKI, Chinese VIP Database, Chinese Wanfang Database and Chinese Biomedicine Database were searched for relevant trials published from June 1994 to August 2013. Meta-DiSc (version 1.4) was used for the meta-analysis. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity, as well as area under the curve (AUC) and the pooled diagnostic accuracy (Q*) derived from a summary receiver operating characteristic analysis. The heterogeneity test was done using the Cochran Q statistic and the I(2) statistic. Significant difference was defined as P < 0.10 (Q-statistic) or I(2) > 50% (I(2) -statistic) and a random effect model was used to pool data, otherwise the fixed effects model was used.
RESULTS: A total of 11 studies (1037 Fallopian tubes) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimates for diagnostic efficacy of 3-D HyCoSy had a sensitivity of 0.92 (95%CI: 0.89-0.94) and specificity of 0.95 (95%CI: 0.93-0.96). AUC and Q* were 0.976 and 0.929, respectively, but there was significant heterogeneity in sensitivity across the included studies.
CONCLUSIONS: 3-D HyCoSy had good diagnostic performance in the detection of tubal occlusion.