Fertility and sterility · 2014
Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dreyer Kim, Out Renée, Hompes Peter G A, Mijatovic Velja
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) is a less painful first line tubal patency test than serial hysterosalpingography (HSG).
DESIGN: A two-center, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: University hospital and teaching hospital.
PATIENT(S): 40 subfertile women, ages 18 to 41 years, with an indication for tubal patency testing as part of the fertility workup according to the Dutch Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obsteterie & Gynaecologie-guidelines.
INTERVENTION(S): Tubal patency testing by HyFoSy versus serial HSG.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores during tubal patency testing.
RESULT(S): The median VAS score for pain perception during the HyFoSy procedure was 1.7 cm (interquartile range: 2.1) compared with 3.7 cm (interquartile range: 4.2) during HSG. The HyFoSy procedure also had a statistically significantly shorter procedure time compared with HSG, with a median of 5.0 minutes (interquartile range: 3.0) for HyFoSy versus 12.5 minutes (interquartile range: 16.0) for HSG.
CONCLUSION(S): The HyFoSy procedure is a less painful and less time-consuming tubal patency test compared with HSG.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands National Trial Register NTR3457.
DESIGN: A two-center, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: University hospital and teaching hospital.
PATIENT(S): 40 subfertile women, ages 18 to 41 years, with an indication for tubal patency testing as part of the fertility workup according to the Dutch Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obsteterie & Gynaecologie-guidelines.
INTERVENTION(S): Tubal patency testing by HyFoSy versus serial HSG.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores during tubal patency testing.
RESULT(S): The median VAS score for pain perception during the HyFoSy procedure was 1.7 cm (interquartile range: 2.1) compared with 3.7 cm (interquartile range: 4.2) during HSG. The HyFoSy procedure also had a statistically significantly shorter procedure time compared with HSG, with a median of 5.0 minutes (interquartile range: 3.0) for HyFoSy versus 12.5 minutes (interquartile range: 16.0) for HSG.
CONCLUSION(S): The HyFoSy procedure is a less painful and less time-consuming tubal patency test compared with HSG.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands National Trial Register NTR3457.