MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/01443615.2011.581319

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2011

How do urogynaecologists treat failed suburethral slings? Experience from the British Society of Urogynaecology database and literature review.

Patil A, Moran P, Duckett J, British Society of Urogynaecology Audit Committee

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Midurethral urethral sling (MUS) procedures have high success and satisfaction rates. A small percentage of MUS operations will fail and most centres have limited experience of treating this outcome. The aim of this study was to review the British Society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) database for women who underwent repeat anti-incontinence surgery after failed MUS. A total of 313 repeat surgical procedures were identified. For any failed MUS, the commonest second surgical intervention was a repeat retropubic MUS and was used in 54% (170/313) of repeat procedures. Bladder neck injections were the second commonest repeat procedure (43/313 cases: 14%). TVT-Os were used as repeat surgery in 12% (38/313) and TOTs in 8% (25/313). Small numbers of colposuspensions (20/313, 6%) and Aldridge slings (6/313, 2%) were also used. A variety of different surgical treatments are used for failed MUSs. From the BSUG database review, the commonest second surgical intervention was a repeat retropubic MUS.

Для цитирования: Patil A, Moran P, Duckett J, British Society of Urogynaecology Audit Committee. How do urogynaecologists treat failed suburethral slings? Experience from the British Society of Urogynaecology database and literature review.. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2011. DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2011.581319.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.