MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.joim.2023.10.004

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of integrative medicine · 2023

Electroacupuncture for abdominal pain relief in patients with acute pancreatitis: A three-arm randomized controlled trial.

Kee Jang Dong, Kyu Lee Jun, Yung Jung Chan, Ho Kim Kyung, Ra Kang Ha, Sun Lee Yeon, Hwa Yoon Jong, Ro Joo Kwang, Kyu Chae Min, Hyeon Baek Yong, Seo Byung-Kwan, Hyub Lee Sang, Lim Chiyeon

Рандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Electroacupuncture (EA) may reduce the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP) and provide additional pain relief in patients with chronic pancreatitis. However, the ability of EA to relieve pain in patients with AP has not been well documented.

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to compare the pain-relieving effects of EA and conventional treatment in patients with AP.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: This study was conducted using a randomized, controlled, three-arm, parallel-group and multi-center design. Patients diagnosed with AP were randomly and equally assigned to EA1, EA2 or control groups. All participants received conventional standard-of-care therapy for AP. Local EA alone was administered in EA1, and local plus distal EA was given in EA2. Local EA included two abdominal acupoints, while distal EA included twelve peripheral acupoints. EA groups underwent one session of EA daily for 4 days (days 1-4), or until pain was resolved or discharged.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the change in the visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-100) pain score between baseline and day 5.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine participants were randomized into EA1, EA2 and control groups, and 88 (EA1, 30; EA2, 29; control, 29) were included in the full-analysis set. VAS score change (median [interquartile range]) on day 5 was (12.3 ± 22.5) in the EA1 group, (10.3 ± 21.5) in the EA2 group, and (8.9 ± 15.2) in the control group. There were not significant differences in the change in VAS score among treatments (P = 0.983). However, time to food intake was significantly shorter in the EA group (EA1 + EA2) than in the control group (median 2.0 days vs 3.0 days), with a hazard ratio of 0.581 (P = 0.022; 95% CI, 0.366-0.924). No significant adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

EA treatment did not significantly reduce pain after 4 days of treatment in patients with AP-associated abdominal pain but significantly reduced time to first food intake.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03173222. Please cite this article as: Jang DK, Lee JK, Jung CY, Kim KH, Kang HR, Lee YS, Yoon JH, Joo KR, Chae MK, Baek YH, Seo BK, Lee SH, Lim C. Electroacupuncture for abdominal pain relief in patients with acute pancreatitis: A three-arm randomized controlled trial. J Integr Med. 2023; 21(6): 537-542.

Для цитирования: Kee Jang Dong, Kyu Lee Jun, Yung Jung Chan, Ho Kim Kyung, Ra Kang Ha, Sun Lee Yeon, Hwa Yoon Jong, Ro Joo Kwang, Kyu Chae Min, Hyeon Baek Yong, Seo Byung-Kwan, Hyub Lee Sang, Lim Chiyeon. Electroacupuncture for abdominal pain relief in patients with acute pancreatitis: A three-arm randomized controlled trial.. Journal of integrative medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.joim.2023.10.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.