Zhonghua yi xue za zhi · 2009
[Comparative study on clinical and pathological changes of liver fibrosis with diffusion-weighted imaging].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhou Mei-Ling, Yan Fu-Hua, Xu Peng-Ju, Chen Cai-Zhong, Shen Ji-Zhang, Li Ren-Chen, Ji Yuan, Shi Jian-Ying
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical practical value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements based on diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) for quantification of liver fibrosis and inflammation for hepatitis viral infection.
METHODS: Diffusion-weighted MRI with parallel imaging was prospectively performed on 85 patients with chronic hepatitis and on 22 healthy volunteers within a single breath-hold using a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence at b values of 100, 300, 500, 800 and 1000 s/mm2 respectively. ADC values of liver were measured with five different b values. The inflammation grades and fibrosis stages were evaluated histologically by biopsy. One-way analysis of variance and Spearman' s rank correlation test were used for statistical analysis. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to assess the performance of ADC in predicting the presence of stage > or = 2 and stage > or = 3 hepatic fibrosis, and grade > or = 1 hepatic inflammation.
RESULTS: There was moderate negative correlation between hepatic ADC values and fibrosis stage. And the best correlation was obtained for a b value of 800 s/mm2 (r = -0.697, P = 0. 000). At all b values there was a significant decrease in hepatic ADC in patients with stage < or = 1 versus stage > or = 2 fibrosis and stage < or = 2 versus stage > or = 3 fibrosis (P < 0.05). Hepatic ADC was a significant predictor of stage > or = 2 and > or = 3 fibrosis. The areas under the curve were 0.909 vs 0.917, sensitivity 76.6% vs 80.0% and specificity 88.3% vs 91.5% (ADC with a b value of 800 s/mm2, 1.26 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less and 1.19 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less). There was weak to moderate negative correlation between ADCs and inflammation grade. Hepatic ADC was a significant predictor of grade > 1 inflammation with an area under the curve of 0.781, sensitivity of 60.0% and specificity of 86.4% (ADC with a b value of 500 s/mm2, 1.54 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less).
CONCLUSION: The DWI measurement of hepatic ADC can be used to quantify liver fibrosis and inflammation. It will be a new approach for early diagnosis and therapeutic follow-up of hepatic fibrosis.
METHODS: Diffusion-weighted MRI with parallel imaging was prospectively performed on 85 patients with chronic hepatitis and on 22 healthy volunteers within a single breath-hold using a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar sequence at b values of 100, 300, 500, 800 and 1000 s/mm2 respectively. ADC values of liver were measured with five different b values. The inflammation grades and fibrosis stages were evaluated histologically by biopsy. One-way analysis of variance and Spearman' s rank correlation test were used for statistical analysis. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was used to assess the performance of ADC in predicting the presence of stage > or = 2 and stage > or = 3 hepatic fibrosis, and grade > or = 1 hepatic inflammation.
RESULTS: There was moderate negative correlation between hepatic ADC values and fibrosis stage. And the best correlation was obtained for a b value of 800 s/mm2 (r = -0.697, P = 0. 000). At all b values there was a significant decrease in hepatic ADC in patients with stage < or = 1 versus stage > or = 2 fibrosis and stage < or = 2 versus stage > or = 3 fibrosis (P < 0.05). Hepatic ADC was a significant predictor of stage > or = 2 and > or = 3 fibrosis. The areas under the curve were 0.909 vs 0.917, sensitivity 76.6% vs 80.0% and specificity 88.3% vs 91.5% (ADC with a b value of 800 s/mm2, 1.26 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less and 1.19 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less). There was weak to moderate negative correlation between ADCs and inflammation grade. Hepatic ADC was a significant predictor of grade > 1 inflammation with an area under the curve of 0.781, sensitivity of 60.0% and specificity of 86.4% (ADC with a b value of 500 s/mm2, 1.54 x 10(-3) mm2/s or less).
CONCLUSION: The DWI measurement of hepatic ADC can be used to quantify liver fibrosis and inflammation. It will be a new approach for early diagnosis and therapeutic follow-up of hepatic fibrosis.