The intensive care medicine research agenda for the management of ICU acquired weakness: a multinational, interprofessional perspective.
СтатьяСистематический обзорПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eggmann Sabrina, Parry Selina M, Broadley Tessa, Lynch Gordon S, Bongetti Amy J, Ridley Emma J, Ayre Elizabeth, Bailey Michael, Bellomo Rinaldo, Berney Sue, Bradley Scott, Buhr Heidi, Campbell Marion K, Casey Kelly, Chapple Lee-Anne S, Connolly Bronwen, Darvall Jai, Deane Adam, Febbraio Mark A, Gosselink Rik, Granger Catherine L, Haines Kimberley, Hanekom Susan, Harhay Michael O, Harrold Meg, Hayes Kate, Hermans Greet, Higgins Alisa, Jain Snigdha, Kho Michelle E, Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan Bharath, Lambell Kate, Lang Jenna K, Leditschke Isabel Anne, Levinger Itamar, Magana Cruz Sherene, Marshall Andrea P, Needham Dale M, Ntoumenopoulos George, Nydahl Peter, Patel Bhakti K, Paton Michelle, Puthucheary Zudin, Rooyackers Olav, Schaller Stefan J, Serpa Neto Ary, Stoppe Christian, Tronstad Oystein, Vanhorebeek Ilse, Z'Graggen Werner J, Hodgson Carol L
Аннотация
Intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW) is common in critically ill patients, contributing to substantial morbidity. Major trials and novel mechanistic findings published over the past years have advanced knowledge for the prevention and treatment of ICUAW. To streamline future research priorities, a multinational, interdisciplinary group of ICU clinicians, researchers, and people with lived experience convened to develop this evidence-based research agenda. Using a stepwise process including a systematic review with meta-analysis, two expert panel meetings, and a two-round modified Delphi method, we identified the top ten research priorities for ICUAW. Our report highlights the lack of reliable prognostic markers and mechanistic understanding that limit early diagnosis and treatment. Current evidence to treat ICUAW supports enhanced physical rehabilitation versus no rehabilitation, while higher dose enterally-delivered protein alone does not improve patient outcomes. However, the direct effects on muscles or appropriate dosing for patients with comorbidities remain largely unknown. The proposed ten key priority research questions integrate pathophysiology, diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up and emphasise personalised medicine and patient-centred outcomes over the continuum of recovery. Future research should focus on early prognostic markers, mechanisms of ICUAW, and identification of treatment responders allowing individualised dosing strategies tailored across the recovery trajectory. Defining meaningful outcomes, improving follow-up care, and integrating patient, family and caregiver priorities are essential. Advancing this agenda will require interdisciplinary collaboration and the use of emerging methods, including artificial intelligence, to support personalised and effective ICUAW care.