MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12880-020-00442-x

Медицинская библиотека · BMC medical imaging · 2020

Improving the diagnosis of common parotid tumors via the combination of CT image biomarkers and clinical parameters.

Zhang Dan, Li Xiaojiao, Lv Liang, Yu Jiayi, Yang Chao, Xiong Hua, Liao Ruikun, Zhou Bi, Huang Xianlong, Liu Xiaoshuang, Tang Zhuoyue

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Our study aims to develop and validate diagnostic models of the common parotid tumors based on whole-volume CT textural image biomarkers (IBMs) in combination with clinical parameters at a single institution.

METHODS

The study cohort was composed of 51 pleomorphic adenoma (PA) patients and 42 Warthin tumor (WT) patients. Clinical parameters and conventional image features were scored retrospectively and textural IBMs were extracted from CT images of arterial phase. Independent-samples t test or Chi-square test was used for evaluating the significance of the difference among clinical parameters, conventional CT image features, and textural IBMs. The diagnostic performance of univariate model and multivariate model was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under ROC curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in clinical parameters (age, gender, disease duration, smoking), conventional image features (site, maximum diameter, time-density curve, peripheral vessels sign) and textural IBMs (mean, uniformity, energy, entropy) between PA group and WT group (P<0.05). ROC analysis showed that clinical parameter (age) and quantitative textural IBMs (mean, energy, entropy) were able to categorize the patients into PA group and WT group, with the AUC of 0.784, 0.902, 0.910, 0.805, respectively. When IBMs were added in clinical model, the multivariate models including age-mean and age-energy performed significantly better than the univariate models with the improved AUC of 0.940, 0.944, respectively (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both clinical parameter and CT textural IBMs can be used for the preoperative, noninvasive diagnosis of parotid PA and WT. The diagnostic performance of textural IBM model was obviously better than that of clinical model and conventional image model in this study. While the multivariate model consisted of clinical parameter and textural IBM had the optimal diagnostic performance, which would contribute to the better selection of individualized surgery program.

Для цитирования: Zhang Dan, Li Xiaojiao, Lv Liang, Yu Jiayi, Yang Chao, Xiong Hua, Liao Ruikun, Zhou Bi, Huang Xianlong, Liu Xiaoshuang, Tang Zhuoyue. Improving the diagnosis of common parotid tumors via the combination of CT image biomarkers and clinical parameters.. BMC medical imaging. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-020-00442-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.