International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2024
Patient-Specific Deep Learning Tracking Framework for Real-Time 2D Target Localization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Radiation Therapy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lombardo Elia, Velezmoro Laura, Marschner Sebastian N, Rabe Moritz, Tejero Claudia, Papadopoulou Christianna I, Sui Zhuojie, Reiner Michael, Corradini Stefanie, Belka Claus, Kurz Christopher, Riboldi Marco, Landry Guillaume
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We propose a tumor tracking framework for 2D cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on a pair of deep learning (DL) models relying on patient-specific (PS) training.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: The chosen DL models are: (1) an image registration transformer and (2) an auto-segmentation convolutional neural network (CNN). We collected over 1,400,000 cine MRI frames from 219 patients treated on a 0.35 T MRI-linac plus 7500 frames from additional 35 patients that were manually labeled and subdivided into fine-tuning, validation, and testing sets. The transformer was first trained on the unlabeled data (without segmentations). We then continued training (with segmentations) either on the fine-tuning set or for PS models based on 8 randomly selected frames from the first 5 seconds of each patient's cine MRI. The PS auto-segmentation CNN was trained from scratch with the same 8 frames for each patient, without pre-training. Furthermore, we implemented B-spline image registration as a conventional model, as well as different baselines. Output segmentations of all models were compared on the testing set using the Dice similarity coefficient, the 50% and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD50%/HD95%), and the root-mean-square-error of the target centroid in superior-inferior direction.
RESULTS: The PS transformer and CNN significantly outperformed all other models, achieving a median (interquartile range) dice similarity coefficient of 0.92 (0.03)/0.90 (0.04), HD50% of 1.0 (0.1)/1.0 (0.4) mm, HD95% of 3.1 (1.9)/3.8 (2.0) mm, and root-mean-square-error of the target centroid in superior-inferior direction of 0.7 (0.4)/0.9 (1.0) mm on the testing set. Their inference time was about 36/8 ms per frame and PS fine-tuning required 3 min for labeling and 8/4 min for training. The transformer was better than the CNN in 9/12 patients, the CNN better in 1/12 patients, and the 2 PS models achieved the same performance on the remaining 2/12 testing patients.
CONCLUSIONS: For targets in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, we found 2 PS DL models to provide accurate real-time target localization during MRI-guided radiotherapy.
METHODS AND MATERIALS: The chosen DL models are: (1) an image registration transformer and (2) an auto-segmentation convolutional neural network (CNN). We collected over 1,400,000 cine MRI frames from 219 patients treated on a 0.35 T MRI-linac plus 7500 frames from additional 35 patients that were manually labeled and subdivided into fine-tuning, validation, and testing sets. The transformer was first trained on the unlabeled data (without segmentations). We then continued training (with segmentations) either on the fine-tuning set or for PS models based on 8 randomly selected frames from the first 5 seconds of each patient's cine MRI. The PS auto-segmentation CNN was trained from scratch with the same 8 frames for each patient, without pre-training. Furthermore, we implemented B-spline image registration as a conventional model, as well as different baselines. Output segmentations of all models were compared on the testing set using the Dice similarity coefficient, the 50% and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD50%/HD95%), and the root-mean-square-error of the target centroid in superior-inferior direction.
RESULTS: The PS transformer and CNN significantly outperformed all other models, achieving a median (interquartile range) dice similarity coefficient of 0.92 (0.03)/0.90 (0.04), HD50% of 1.0 (0.1)/1.0 (0.4) mm, HD95% of 3.1 (1.9)/3.8 (2.0) mm, and root-mean-square-error of the target centroid in superior-inferior direction of 0.7 (0.4)/0.9 (1.0) mm on the testing set. Their inference time was about 36/8 ms per frame and PS fine-tuning required 3 min for labeling and 8/4 min for training. The transformer was better than the CNN in 9/12 patients, the CNN better in 1/12 patients, and the 2 PS models achieved the same performance on the remaining 2/12 testing patients.
CONCLUSIONS: For targets in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, we found 2 PS DL models to provide accurate real-time target localization during MRI-guided radiotherapy.