AI-enhanced cancer radiotherapy quality assessment: utilizing daily linac performance, radiomics, dosimetrics, and planning complexity.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to develop and validate an Informer- Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model to predict the gamma passing rate (GPR) for patient-specific quality assurance in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), enhancing treatment safety and efficacy by integrating multiple data sources.
METHODS
Analyzing 465 VMAT treatment plans covering head & neck, chest, and abdomen, the study extracted data from 31 complexity indicators, 123 radiomics features, and 123 dosimetrics indices, along with daily linac performance data including 141 key performance indicators. A hybrid Informer-CNN architecture was used to handle both temporal and non-temporal data for predicting GPR.
RESULTS
The Informer-CNN model demonstrated superior predictive performance over traditional models like Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory(LSTM), and Informer. Specifically, in the validation set, the model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0273 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0360 using the 3%/3mm criterion. In the test set, the MAE was 0.0327 and the RMSE was 0.0468. The model also showed high classification performance with AUC scores of 0.97 and 0.95 in test and validation sets, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The developed Informer-CNN model significantly enhances the prediction accuracy and classification of gamma passing rates in VMAT treatment plans. It facilitates early integration of daily accelerator performance data, improving the assessment and verification of treatment plans for better patient-specific quality assurance.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.