Primary and Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Custom-Made 3D-Printed Baseplates for Severe Multiplanar Glenoid Bone Defects: A Retrospective Study of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.

Background

Severe glenoid bone loss presents a major challenge in both primary and revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Standard implants often fail to achieve reliable fixation in these cases. Custom-made, 3D-printed glenoid components have emerged as a potential solution, offering anatomically tailored fit and fixation. This study evaluates the clinical and radiographic outcomes of custom-made glenoid implants in managing severe glenoid bone loss.

Methods

A retrospective, multicenter study was conducted on 23 shoulders (11 primary and 12 revision RSAs) that received a custom-made glenoid component using the Enovis ProMade System (San Daniele del Friuli, Udine, Italy) between 2017 and 2022, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Preoperative planning utilized CT-based 3D modeling to design implants with patient-specific instrumentation. Clinical outcomes (ROM, pain, Constant-Murley score) and radiographic results were assessed. Statistical comparisons were made between primary and revision groups.

Results

Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in shoulder mobility, pain relief, and Constant-Murley scores (all p < 0.001), with no significant differences between primary and revision groups in delta scores. Radiographically, no loosening was observed, with minimal radiolucent lines and low complication rates. Four cases of instability occurred, all in the revision group, with only one requiring conversion to hemiarthroplasty. No differences in radiographic outcomes were observed between groups.

Conclusions

Custom-made glenoid implants provide a reliable solution for severe glenoid bone loss in both primary and revision RSA, yielding consistent functional improvement and implant stability. Further prospective studies with larger cohorts and long-term follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings and assess cost-effectiveness.