International journal of clinical oncology · 2024
Prognostic value of a mandibular canal staging system for primary lesions in patients with lower gingival squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter, retrospective study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yamakawa Nobuhiro, Okura Masaya, Hasegawa Takumi, Otsuru Mitsunobu, Sakai Hironori, Hirai Eiji, Rin Shin, Yamada Shin-Ichi, Yanamoto Souichi, Yokota Yusuke, Umeda Masahiro, Kurita Hiroshi, Ueda Michihiro, Akashi Masaya, Kirita Tadaaki, Japan Oral Oncology Group (JOOG)
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The Union for International Cancer Control and American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor staging system is used globally for treatment planning. As it may be insufficient for tumor staging of lower gingival carcinomas, we proposed the mandibular canal tumor staging system. In this study, we aimed to compare the two systems for such tumor staging and to identify prognostic markers.
METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with lower gingival squamous cell carcinoma who underwent radical surgery during 2001-2018. We compared survival rates (Kaplan-Meier estimator) and patient stratification according to the two systems.
RESULTS: The proposed system yielded more balanced patient stratification than the existing system. Progression in the tumor grade according to the proposed system was associated with a poorer prognosis. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates for the entire cohort were 74.9% and 81.8%, respectively. Independent factors affecting overall survival were tumor stage according to the proposed system, excision margins, and number of positive nodes, whereas those affecting disease-specific survival were excision margins and number of positive nodes.
CONCLUSIONS: Subsite-specific tumor classification should be used for patients with oral cancer, and our results suggest that mandibular canal tumor classification may be effective for patients with lower gingival carcinoma.
METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with lower gingival squamous cell carcinoma who underwent radical surgery during 2001-2018. We compared survival rates (Kaplan-Meier estimator) and patient stratification according to the two systems.
RESULTS: The proposed system yielded more balanced patient stratification than the existing system. Progression in the tumor grade according to the proposed system was associated with a poorer prognosis. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates for the entire cohort were 74.9% and 81.8%, respectively. Independent factors affecting overall survival were tumor stage according to the proposed system, excision margins, and number of positive nodes, whereas those affecting disease-specific survival were excision margins and number of positive nodes.
CONCLUSIONS: Subsite-specific tumor classification should be used for patients with oral cancer, and our results suggest that mandibular canal tumor classification may be effective for patients with lower gingival carcinoma.