MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy · 2009

[The outpatient palliative care conference for the home palliative care shift (the second report)--the conference was used to look back on the case where the patient's QOL was kept and improved].

Asaba Kaori, Chigira Mayumi, Hashimoto Eiko, Hano Ayumi, Sofue Akira, Umeki Mikiko, Murotsu Keizo, Ozawa Hiroyuki, Shiraishi Ko

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The patient was a 30-year-old woman with right tongue cancer and SCC (T4N2bM0). After it had relapsed, the outpatient palliative care conference intervened. The purpose of intervention was as follows: pain control, nutrition management, home recuperation support, and relief of a spiritual pain. We could achieve the patient's desire to recuperate at home as long as possible by sharing a goal and information. The patient was treated for a total of 457 days. Since the relapse, she was treated for 274 days, and was hospitalized for 49 days. By offering necessary home care supports, the patient and family fully demonstrated their potentials what they could do to recuperate and resulted in a long home stay. It was thought that our relationship with the patient and family appeared to have enhanced their self-resistance feelings against the disease. Consequently, we contributed the improvement of QOL.

Для цитирования: Asaba Kaori, Chigira Mayumi, Hashimoto Eiko, Hano Ayumi, Sofue Akira, Umeki Mikiko, Murotsu Keizo, Ozawa Hiroyuki, Shiraishi Ko. [The outpatient palliative care conference for the home palliative care shift (the second report)--the conference was used to look back on the case where the patient's QOL was kept and improved].. Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy. 2009.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.